Long-Term Results of Anderson–Hynes Pyeloplasty in Children: How Long Follow-Up Is Necessary?

Abstract Purpose After a successful pyeloplasty at 3 to 6 months, the question remains whether children need a long follow-up. Methods The medical charts of patients with long-term follow-up (> 5 years), who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) from May 1998 to May 2007, excluding those with bilateral UPJO, solitary kidney, associated vesicoureteral reflux or other abnormalities, and inconclusive renogram due to poor renal function, were retrospectively reviewed. Ultrasonography, differential renal function (DRF, DMSA), and renal drainage on diuretic renography (diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate technetium-99 or DTPA-Tc99) were performed at 3 and 6 months every year. Results Complete data were available for 28 consecutive patients (28 renal unities) with 2 months to 12 years (mean age, 2.4 years) at surgery, of whom 21 (75%) were boys, 17 diagnosed prenatally (61%) and 18 unities (64.3%) were left, with median follow-up of 10.7 years. Images were graded according to the Society for Fetal Urology grading system: Grade III in 11 (49%) and grade IV in 17 (61%). All cases presented > 10% DRF (DMSA) and obstructed DTPA-Tc99. The T1/2 (the half-time of drainage) less than 20 minutes at 3 months was found in 21 cases (75%) and less than 25 minutes in 7 cases (25%). Renal function and patency were maintained during follow-up for all units with 8% maximum fluctuation of DRF. One index case (3.6%) of renal function deterioration presented DRF fluctuation > 8% at 3 months (from 23 to 32%) and progressive hydronephrosis and indeterminate DTPA at 6 months. Conclusions Satisfactory diuretic renogram at 3 to 6 months after pyeloplasty with maintained renal function and stable hydronephrosis suggests no need for further follow-up and indicates no functional loss with time. More than 8% DRF fluctuation might be a significant cutoff for further intervention aiming nephron preservation.

[1]  A. Lorenzo,et al.  Failed pyeloplasty in children: revisiting the unknown. , 2013, Urology.

[2]  D. Bägli,et al.  Early postoperative ultrasound after open pyeloplasty in children with prenatal hydronephrosis helps identify low risk of recurrent obstruction. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[3]  L. Reis,et al.  Antegrade pressure measurement of urinary tract in children with persistent hydronephrosis. , 2012, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[4]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Long-term results of pyeloplasty in poorly functioning kidneys in the pediatric age group. , 2012, Journal of pediatric urology.

[5]  D. Wilcox,et al.  Screening ultrasound in follow-up after pediatric pyeloplasty. , 2010, Urology.

[6]  J. Capolicchio,et al.  Is routine renography required after pyeloplasty? , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[7]  D. Bägli,et al.  Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[8]  L. Reis,et al.  [Postnatally hydronephrosis (HN) in children with antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: surgery or medical treatment?]. , 2008, Actas urologicas espanolas.

[9]  J. Scheepe,et al.  Prolonged follow‐up after paediatric pyeloplasty: are repeat scans necessary? , 2007, BJU international.

[10]  John C. Thomas,et al.  Management of the failed pyeloplasty: a contemporary review. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[11]  F. Hernández,et al.  [Pyeloplasty follow-up. How and how long?]. , 2004, Cirugía pediátrica.

[12]  M. Leonard,et al.  Long-term followup of pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty: how long is long enough? , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Y. Abe,et al.  Ultrasound grade of hydronephrosis and severity of renal cortical damage on 99m technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan in infants with unilateral hydronephrosis during followup and after pyeloplasty. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[14]  H. Pohl,et al.  Early diuresis renogram findings predict success following pyeloplasty. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[15]  P. O’Reilly,et al.  The long‐term results of Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty , 2001, BJU international.

[16]  R. Walker,et al.  Management of the failed pyeloplasty. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[17]  C. Kuni,et al.  Postoperative Diuresis Renography and Ultrasound in Patients Undergoing Pyeloplasty Predictors of Surgical Outcome , 1993, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[18]  J. Beaugié,et al.  The long-term follow-up of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis. , 1973, British journal of urology.