Impact of a computerized information system on quality of nutritional support in the ICU.

OBJECTIVE In intensive care units (ICUs), patient outcome depends on quality of nutritional support. We investigated the effect of computerized information systems (CISs) on quality of nutritional support by comparing two ICUs with or without CIS and burned patients before and after CIS implementation. METHODS Part 1 was a 2-wk prospective survey in two units of a surgical ICU: unit A (11 beds) without CIS and unit B (four beds) with CIS. Part 2 consisted of two 18-mo periods in burn patients before and after CIS implementation. Nurses and doctors belonged to the same team; procedures were identical. A computer page was configured to retrieve data related to nutritional support. RESULTS A total of 1313 ICU days were analyzed in 109 patients. Patients' characteristics were similar in parts 1 and 2. In part 1, nutritional support was required 38% of days. Nutritional route was similar but data were more frequently missing in unit A. Energy delivery was higher with CIS but below target values in both units (31+/-11% of target in unit A, 77+/-4% in unit B). Computations were incomplete and time consuming for unit A versus B (11+/-2 versus 2+/-1 min/patient, P<0.0001). In part 2, in the 54 burn patients, use of postpyloric feeding tubes and energy delivery increased with CIS, resulting in less weight loss. CONCLUSION Computerized information systems favored standardization of nutritional care and monitoring, thus decreasing time required for writing and computations. Follow-up was improved and nutrient delivery was closer to target values, thus increasing quality of care. In burn patients, the better data visibility was associated with a significant improvement in nutrient delivery.

[1]  Emmy Rood,et al.  Intensive care information system reduces documentation time of the nurses after cardiothoracic surgery , 2002, Intensive Care Medicine.

[2]  Lewis Rubinson,et al.  Low caloric intake is associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients in the medical intensive care unit* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[3]  Format of medical order sheet improves security of antibiotics prescription: The experience of an intensive care unit* , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[4]  Paul Taylor,et al.  Research Paper: Use of a Computerized Guideline for Glucose Regulation in the Intensive Care Unit Improved Both Guideline Adherence and Glucose Regulation , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  M. Berger,et al.  Negative impact of hypocaloric feeding and energy balance on clinical outcome in ICU patients. , 2005, Clinical nutrition.

[6]  J. Vincent,et al.  The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure , 1996, Intensive Care Medicine.

[7]  I. Font-Noguera,et al.  Quality improvement in parenteral nutrition care. , 2001, Clinical nutrition.

[8]  D. Sindhusake,et al.  Attitudes of Australian nurses toward the implementation of a clinical information system. , 1997, Computers in nursing.

[9]  K. Lundholm Perioperative artificial nutrition in elective adult surgery. , 1996, Clinical nutrition.

[10]  B. Mikkelsen,et al.  Food and nutritional care in hospitals: how to prevent undernutrition--report and guidelines from the Council of Europe. , 2001, Clinical nutrition.

[11]  M. Berger,et al.  A 10-year survey of nutritional support in a surgical ICU: 1986-1995. , 1997, Nutrition.

[12]  A. Donabedian,et al.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed? , 1988, JAMA.

[13]  A. Board Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. , 1993, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[14]  Emmy Rood,et al.  Use of a computerized guideline for glucose regulation in the intensive care unit improved both guide-line adherence and glucose regulation , 2005 .

[15]  C. Pichard,et al.  Enteral nutrition in intensive care patients: a practicalapproach , 1999 .

[16]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Research Paper: Improving Response to Critical Laboratory Results with Automation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. , 1993, JAMA.

[18]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[19]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. , 1999, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[20]  M Peters,et al.  Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.