The Paradox of Enrichment in Metaecosystems

The paradox of enrichment has been studied almost exclusively within communities or metacommunities, without explicit nutrient dynamics. Yet local recycling of materials from enriched ecosystems may affect the stability of connected ecosystems. Here we study the effect of nutrient, detritus, producer, and consumer spatial flows—combined with changes in regional enrichment—on the stability of a metaecosystem model. We considered both spatially homogeneous and heterogeneous enrichment. We found that nutrient and detritus spatial flows are destabilizing, whereas producer or consumer spatial flows are either neutral or stabilizing. We noticed that detritus spatial flows have only a weak impact on stability. Our study reveals that heterogeneity no longer stabilizes well-connected systems when accounting for explicit representation of nutrient dynamics. We also found that intermediate consumer diffusion could lead to multiple equilibria in strongly enriched metaecosystems. Stability can emerge from a top-down control allowing the storage of materials into inorganic form, a mechanism never documented before. In conclusion, local enrichment can be stabilized if spatial flows are strong enough to efficiently redistribute the local excess of enrichment to unfertile ecosystems. However, high regional enrichment can be dampened only by intermediate consumer diffusion rates.

[1]  J. Elser,et al.  Nutrient availability and phytoplankton nutrient limitation across a gradient of atmospheric nitrogen deposition. , 2009, Ecology.

[2]  R M Nisbet,et al.  Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community , 2001, Nature.

[3]  K. McCann,et al.  Cross-ecosystem differences in stability and the principle of energy flux. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[4]  S. Krupa Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[5]  J. Clobert,et al.  Connectivity and homogenisation of population sizes: an experimental approach in Lacerta vivipara , 2004 .

[6]  Karen C. Abbott A dispersal-induced paradox: synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopulations. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[7]  S. Ellner,et al.  Crossing the hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. , 2000, Science.

[8]  M. Brockhurst,et al.  Dispersal and natural enemies interact to drive spatial synchrony and decrease stability in patchy populations. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[9]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability , 2007, Nature.

[10]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Stability of enriched aquatic ecosystems. , 1972, Science.

[11]  Peter A Abrams,et al.  How does adaptive consumer movement affect population dynamics in consumer-resource metacommunities with homogeneous patches? , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  Sarah C. Elmendorf,et al.  AN INTRODUCED PREDATOR ALTERS ALEUTIAN ISLAND PLANT COMMUNITIES BY THWARTING NUTRIENT SUBSIDIES , 2006 .

[13]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  Testing the Paradox of Enrichment along a Land Use Gradient in a Multitrophic Aboveground and Belowground Community , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Shovonlal Roy,et al.  The stability of ecosystems: A brief overview of the paradox of enrichment , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[15]  Katia Koelle,et al.  Dispersal‐induced desynchronization: from metapopulations to metacommunities , 2004 .

[16]  S. Aulagnier,et al.  Roe deer may markedly alter forest nitrogen and phosphorus budgets across Europe , 2012 .

[17]  F. Guichard,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of enriched metacommunities. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  A. Slotte,et al.  Meta-ecosystems and biological energy transport from ocean to coast: the ecological importance of herring migration , 2005, Oecologia.

[19]  J. Myers,et al.  Plant nitrogen and fluctuations of insect populations: A test with the cinnabar moth—tansy ragwort system , 1981, Oecologia.

[20]  H. Grossart,et al.  Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems , 2002 .

[21]  Petra Klepac,et al.  Stabilizing dispersal delays in predator-prey metapopulation models. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[22]  D. Worthen Stability of Enriched Aquatic Ecosystems , 2005 .

[23]  V. Křivan,et al.  Alternative Food, Switching Predators, and the Persistence of Predator‐Prey Systems , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[24]  J. Urabe,et al.  Regulation of herbivore growth by the balance of light and nutrients. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Buckling,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and the stability of host‐parasite coexistence , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[26]  L. Seeb,et al.  How Stock of Origin Affects Performance of Individuals across a Meta-Ecosystem: An Example from Sockeye Salmon , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Eli E. Goldwyn,et al.  Small Heterogeneity Has Large Effects on Synchronization of Ecological Oscillators , 2009, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[28]  M. Holyoak Effects of nutrient enrichment on predator–prey metapopulation dynamics , 2000 .

[29]  M. Holyoak,et al.  Persistence of an Extinction-Prone Predator-Prey Interaction Through Metapopulation Dynamics , 1996 .

[30]  F. Guichard,et al.  Source and sink dynamics in meta-ecosystems. , 2010, Ecology.

[31]  J. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Effect of cannibalism on a predator–prey system with nutritional value: a model based study , 2011 .

[32]  Discrete consumers, small scale resource heterogeneity, and population stability , 1998 .

[33]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[34]  F. MaríaIsabelCabrera Deterministic approach to the study of the interaction predator–prey in a chemostat with predator mutual interference. Implications for the paradox of enrichment , 2011 .

[35]  T. Fukami,et al.  Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[36]  T. Nielsen,et al.  Trophic interactions between heterotrophic nanoflagellates and bacterioplankton in manipulated seawater enclosures1 , 1988 .

[37]  Justin N. Marleau,et al.  Nutrient flows between ecosystems can destabilize simple food chains. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  D. Post,et al.  Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity , 2004 .

[39]  Andrew Morozov,et al.  Nutrient-rich plankton communities stabilized via predator-prey interactions: revisiting the role of vertical heterogeneity. , 2011, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[40]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  Evaluating and Ranking the Vulnerability of Global Marine Ecosystems to Anthropogenic Threats , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  Eli E. Goldwyn,et al.  When can dispersal synchronize populations? , 2008, Theoretical population biology.

[42]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Unifying sources and sinks in ecology and Earth sciences , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[43]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The Whale Pump: Marine Mammals Enhance Primary Productivity in a Coastal Basin , 2010, PloS one.

[44]  S. Carpenter,et al.  NONPOINT POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS WITH PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[45]  E. Wolkovich,et al.  Scavenging: how carnivores and carrion structure communities. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  Jitsuro Sugie,et al.  Uniqueness of Limit Cycles in a Rosenzweig-MacArthur Model with Prey Immigration , 2012, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[47]  Serhiy Morozov,et al.  A Distributed, Architecture-Centric Approach to Computing Accurate Recommendations from Very Large and Sparse Datasets , 2011 .

[48]  R. Rockwell,et al.  Agricultural Food Subsidies, Migratory Connectivity and Large-Scale Disturbance in Arctic Coastal Systems: A Case Study1 , 2004, Integrative and comparative biology.

[49]  M. Llope,et al.  Predator transitory spillover induces trophic cascades in ecological sinks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  C. Gratton,et al.  Ecosystem Linkages Between Lakes and the Surrounding Terrestrial Landscape in Northeast Iceland , 2008, Ecosystems.

[51]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Whole-system nutrient enrichment increases secondary production in a detritus-based ecosystem. , 2006, Ecology.

[52]  Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with predators using hawk and dove tactics. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  John Vandermeer,et al.  Coupled Oscillations in Food Webs: Balancing Competition and Mutualism in Simple Ecological Models , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[54]  N. Yamamura,et al.  Unpalatable prey resolves the paradox of enrichment , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  W. Wilson,et al.  Pattern Formation and the Spatial Scale of Interaction between Predators and Their Prey. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[56]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  A Practical Guide to Ecological Modelling: Using R as a Simulation Platform , 2008 .

[57]  C. Huffaker Experimental studies on predation : dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations , 1958 .

[58]  G. Heil,et al.  The role of nutrients in the interactions between a herbivorous beetle and some competing plant species in heathlands , 1985 .

[59]  J. Ripa,et al.  The Coupling Between Grazing and Detritus Food Chains and the Strength of Trophic Cascades Across a Gradient of Nutrient Enrichment , 2008, Ecosystems.

[60]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[61]  F. Guichard,et al.  Patch Dynamics, Persistence, and Species Coexistence in Metaecosystems , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[62]  R. Holt,et al.  Meta‐ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology , 2003 .

[63]  B. Ebenman,et al.  Confronting the Paradox of Enrichment to the Metacommunity Perspective , 2013, PloS one.

[64]  W. Shen,et al.  Blowing litter across a landscape: effects on ecosystem nutrient flux and implications for landscape management , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[65]  R. Herbert Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[66]  H. Welsh,et al.  First published online as a Review in Advance on July 26, 2004 ON THE ECOLOGICAL ROLES OF SALAMANDERS ∗ , 2022 .

[67]  William Gurney,et al.  PLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND DYNAMICS ACROSS NUTRIENT LEVELS: TESTS OF HYPOTHESES , 1998 .

[68]  Priyanga Amarasekare,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of Communities with Intraguild Predation: The Role of Dispersal Strategies , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[69]  S. R. Wilkinson,et al.  The relationship of land use practices to surface water quality in the Upper Oconee Watershed of Georgia , 2000 .

[70]  P. Klepac,et al.  Dispersal delays, predator-prey stability, and the paradox of enrichment. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[71]  P. Warren,et al.  Environmental impact propagated by cross-system subsidy: chronic stream pollution controls riparian spider populations. , 2011, Ecology.

[72]  Robert M. May,et al.  Time delays, density-dependence and single-species oscillations , 1974 .

[73]  A. Verschoor,et al.  Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi‐ and tritrophic food chains , 2004 .

[74]  K. McCann,et al.  Harvesting creates ecological traps: consequences of invisible mortality risks in predator-prey metacommunities. , 2012, Ecology.

[75]  J. Fox,et al.  Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator–prey community , 2009, Nature.

[76]  Priyanga Amarasekare,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of Foodwebs , 2008 .

[77]  W. Mooij,et al.  Algal defenses, population stability, and the risk of herbivore extinctions: a chemostat model and experiment , 2009, Ecological Research.

[78]  D. Earn,et al.  Coherence and conservation. , 2000, Science.

[79]  Pierre Auger,et al.  Enrichment Paradox Induced by Spatial Heterogeneity in a Phytoplankton - Zooplankton System , 2008 .

[80]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[81]  G. Polis,et al.  TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE AND FOOD WEB ECOLOGY : The Dynamics of Spatially Subsidized Food Webs , 2005 .

[82]  T. Fukami,et al.  Linking community and ecosystem dynamics through spatial ecology. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[83]  M. Loreau,et al.  Density-dependent dispersal and relative dispersal affect the stability of predator-prey metacommunities. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[84]  T. Kiørboe Formation and fate of marine snow: small-scale processes with large- scale implications , 2001 .

[85]  S. Walde,et al.  Stability of pitcher‐plant microfaunal populations depends on food web structure , 2005 .

[86]  Vincent A. A. Jansen,et al.  Regulation of predator-prey systems through spatial interactions:a possible solution to the paradox of enrichment. , 1995 .

[87]  Horst Malchow,et al.  Experimental demonstration of chaos in a microbial food web , 2005, Nature.

[88]  James G. Mitchell,et al.  Iron defecation by sperm whales stimulates carbon export in the Southern Ocean , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[89]  S. Carpenter Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: bistability and soil phosphorus. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[90]  K. R. Arrigo,et al.  Impacts of Atmospheric Anthropogenic Nitrogen on the Open Ocean , 2008, Science.

[91]  L. Luckinbill,et al.  Coexistence in Laboratory Populations of Paramecium Aurelia and Its Predator Didinium Nasutum , 1973 .

[92]  M. Hoopes,et al.  Stabilizing effects in spatial parasitoid-host and predator-prey models: a review. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[93]  W. Wilson,et al.  Spatial Instabilities within the Diffusive Lotka-Volterra System: Individual-Based Simulation Results , 1993 .

[94]  K. McCann,et al.  The roles of spatial heterogeneity and adaptive movement in stabilizing (or destabilizing) simple metacommunities. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[95]  F. Sklar,et al.  Heterogeneity of phosphorus distribution in a patterned landscape, the Florida Everglades , 2008, Plant Ecology.

[96]  M. Holyoak,et al.  EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR PREDATOR–PREY SOURCE–SINK DYNAMICS , 2000 .

[97]  R. Arditi,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and functional response: an experiment in microcosms with varying obstacle densities , 2010, Oecologia.

[98]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Lateral Diffusion of Nutrients by Mammalian Herbivores in Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2013, PloS one.

[99]  Takehito Yoshida,et al.  Non-random spatial coupling induces desynchronization, chaos and multistability in a predator-prey-resource system. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[100]  V. Jansen,et al.  Phase locking: another cause of synchronicity in predator-prey systems. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[101]  A. Wade,et al.  Place Eugène Bataillon , 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05 , 2009 .

[102]  Jennifer G. Howeth,et al.  Predation inhibits the positive effect of dispersal on intraspecific and interspecific synchrony in pond metacommunities. , 2013, Ecology.

[103]  Kevin McCann,et al.  Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs , 2006, Nature.

[104]  M. Daugherty Host plant quality, spatial heterogeneity, and the stability of mite predator–prey dynamics , 2010, Experimental and Applied Acarology.

[105]  R. Law,et al.  Coupled energy pathways and the resilience of size-structured food webs , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[106]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[107]  D. Schindler,et al.  Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems , 2002 .

[108]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment , 2004 .

[109]  J. Lynch,et al.  Ecological effects of nitrogen and sulfur air pollution in the US: what do we know? , 2012 .

[110]  Cunningham,et al.  Extinction by infection. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[111]  Bernd Blasius,et al.  A graphical theory of competition on spatial resource gradients. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[112]  H. Grossart,et al.  Effects of pollen leaching and microbial degradation on organic carbon and nutrient availability in lake water , 2011, Aquatic Sciences.

[113]  William G. Wilson,et al.  Mobility versus density-limited predator-prey dynamics on different spatial scales , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[114]  Andrew M. Edwards,et al.  Adding Detritus to a Nutrient–Phytoplankton–Zooplankton Model:A Dynamical-Systems Approach , 2001 .

[115]  F. Hilker,et al.  Disease-induced stabilization of predator-prey oscillations. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.