Anticipatory signals in kinematics and muscle activity during functional grasp and release

Robotic assistive devices show potential to aid hand function using surface electromyography (sEMG) as a control signal. Current implementations of these robotic systems typically do not include interaction with the environment, which naturally occurs during functional tasks. Further, many applications have experts place the sEMG sensors on specific muscles, which benefits precision alignment that may not be possible by non-experts. This study informs algorithm development for controlling assistive devices for grasping and releasing objects using kinematics and non-specifically placed sEMG sensors. Significant effects of object type were found in the grip aperture and joint kinematics. Muscle activity was significantly affected by small alignment changes in the sensor placement, yet the features analyzed showed anticipatory mechanisms prior to grasp and release. The appropriate inclusion of placement variability within a control architecture can be coupled with the kinematics and sEMG features to inform object type and anticipate grasp and release.

[1]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Preliminary functional assessment of a multigrasp myoelectric prosthesis , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  A. Willsky,et al.  Upper Extremity Limb Function Discrimination Using EMG Signal Analysis , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Eli Brenner,et al.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[6]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Louise P. Kirsch,et al.  Information about the Weight of Grasped Objects from Vision and Internal Models Interacts within the Primary Motor Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Demonstrating the feasibility of using forearm electromyography for muscle-computer interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[9]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  Virtual exertions: A user interface combining visual information, kinesthetics and biofeedback for virtual object manipulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[11]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[13]  T Brochier,et al.  A cortico-cortical mechanism mediating object-driven grasp in humans. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Qingling Li,et al.  sEMG control of an upper limb rehabilitation robot based on boosting of neural networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[16]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Gradual molding of the hand to object contours. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Elisabeth André,et al.  EMG-based hand gesture recognition for realtime biosignal interfacing , 2008, IUI '08.

[19]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Surface EMG pattern recognition for real-time control of a wrist exoskeleton , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[20]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[21]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  An EMG-controlled neuroprosthesis for daily upper limb support: A preliminary study , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult Norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of Finger Dexterity , 1985 .

[24]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Exoskeletons for human power augmentation , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[26]  M. Levin,et al.  Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Ravinder Agarwal,et al.  Interpretations of Wrist/Grip Operations From SEMG Signals at Different Locations on Arm , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[28]  U. Castiello The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Christopher Assad,et al.  Gesture-based robot control with variable autonomy from the JPL BioSleeve , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[30]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Model of the Upper Extremity for Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery and Analyzing Neuromuscular Control , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Myoelectric teleoperation of a complex robotic hand , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[33]  Marco Santello,et al.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.