Highs and lows. Genetic susceptibility to daily events

Why people differ in their susceptibility to external events is essential to our understanding of personality, human development, and mental disorders. Genes explain a substantial portion of these differences. Specifically, genes influencing the serotonin system are hypothesized to be differential susceptibility factors , determining a person’s reactivity to both positive and negative environments. We tested whether genetic variation in the serotonin transporter ( 5-HTTLPR ) is a differential susceptibility factor for daily events. Participants ( N = 326, 77% female, mean age = 25, range = 17–36) completed smartphone questionnaires four times a day over four to five days, measuring stressors, uplifts, positive and negative affect. Affect was predicted from environment valence in the previous hour on a within-person level using three-level autoregressive linear mixed models. The 5-HTTLPR fulfilled all criteria of a differential susceptibility factor: Positive affect in carriers of the short allele (S) was less reactive to both uplifts and stressors, compared to homozygous carriers of the long allele (L/L). This pattern might reflect relative affective inflexibility in S-allele carriers. Our

[1]  F. Tuerlinckx,et al.  Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[2]  P. Sullivan,et al.  No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples. , 2019, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  Matthias G. Arend,et al.  Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. , 2019, Psychological methods.

[4]  S. Claes,et al.  Gene-environment interactions between stress and 5-HTTLPR in depression: A meta-analytic update. , 2018, Journal of affective disorders.

[5]  P. Kuppens,et al.  Variation in the Serotonin Transporter Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and Inertia of Negative and Positive Emotions in Daily Life , 2017, Emotion.

[6]  James R. Yancey,et al.  Evidence of a prominent genetic basis for associations between psychoneurometric traits and common mental disorders. , 2017, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  L. Bierut,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression , 2017, Molecular Psychiatry.

[8]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Centering Predictor Variables in Three-Level Contextual Models , 2017, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  S. Armeli,et al.  Daily emotional stress reactivity in emerging adulthood: temporal stability and its predictors , 2017, Anxiety, Stress, & Coping.

[10]  M. Del Giudice Statistical tests of differential susceptibility: Performance, limitations, and improvements , 2017, Development and Psychopathology.

[11]  Ajay B. Satpute,et al.  The Brain Basis of Positive and Negative Affect: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis of the Human Neuroimaging Literature. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Peter Green,et al.  SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation , 2016 .

[13]  R. Depue,et al.  Neurobehavioral foundation of environmental reactivity. , 2016, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  M. Pluess Individual Differences in Environmental Sensitivity , 2015 .

[15]  J. Rottenberg,et al.  Emerging evidence for emotion context insensitivity in depression , 2015 .

[16]  T. Trull,et al.  Affective Dynamics in Psychopathology , 2015, Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion.

[17]  P. Andrews,et al.  Is serotonin an upper or a downer? The evolution of the serotonergic system and its role in depression and the antidepressant response , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  M. Bakermans-Kranenburg,et al.  Genetic differential susceptibility on trial: Meta-analytic support from randomized controlled experiments , 2015, Development and Psychopathology.

[19]  R. Kahn,et al.  STRESS EXPOSURE ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN CUMULATIVELY INCREASES DEPRESSION RISK AND IS MODERATED BY NEUROTICISM , 2014, Depression and anxiety.

[20]  K. Markon,et al.  A meta-analytic evaluation of the endophenotype hypothesis: effects of measurement paradigm in the psychiatric genetics of impulsivity. , 2014, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[22]  Emiliano Agüero-Tejado Short polymorphism of the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) gene and its association with the cortisol stress response: a meta-analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. , 2014, Psychological methods.

[24]  C. Hammen,et al.  Daily stress reactivity and serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR) variation: internalizing responses to everyday stress as a possible transdiagnostic phenotype , 2014, Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders.

[25]  A. Serretti,et al.  The 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Journal of traumatic stress.

[26]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[27]  P. Cowen,et al.  The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on amygdala function: a meta-analysis , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.

[28]  N. Bolger,et al.  Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research , 2013 .

[29]  J. Belsky,et al.  Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[30]  J. Belsky,et al.  Serotonin transporter genotype 5HTTLPR as a marker of differential susceptibility? A meta-analysis of child and adolescent gene-by-environment studies , 2012, Translational Psychiatry.

[31]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Trends in ambulatory self-report: the role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. , 2012, Psychosomatic medicine.

[32]  A. Meade,et al.  Identifying careless responses in survey data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[33]  T. Bradbury,et al.  Genetic moderation of sensitivity to positive and negative affect in marriage. , 2012, Emotion.

[34]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Variations in the Promoter Region of the Serotonin Transporter Gene and Biased Attention for Emotional Information: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[35]  W. Johnson,et al.  Heritability in the Era of Molecular Genetics: Some Thoughts for Understanding Genetic Influences on Behavioural Traits , 2011 .

[36]  P. Delespaul,et al.  Neuroticism explained? From a non-informative vulnerability marker to informative person-context interactions in the realm of daily life. , 2011, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[37]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Further evidence for mixed emotions. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  T. Kashdan,et al.  Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. , 2010, Clinical psychology review.

[39]  E. M. Tong,et al.  Personality influences in appraisal-emotion relationships: the role of neuroticism. , 2010, Journal of personality.

[40]  J. Belsky,et al.  Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? , 2009, Molecular Psychiatry.

[41]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology , 2009 .

[42]  Günther Sawitzki,et al.  Ambulatory assessment of affective instability in borderline personality disorder: The effect of the sampling frequency. , 2007 .

[43]  T. Conner,et al.  Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and Anxiety Reactivity in Daily Life: A Daily Process Approach to Gene-Environment Interaction , 2007, Psychosomatic medicine.

[44]  J. Flint,et al.  Mapping regulatory variants for the serotonin transporter gene based on allelic expression imbalance , 2007, Molecular Psychiatry.

[45]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[46]  D. Murphy,et al.  Simultaneous genotyping of four functional loci of human SLC6A4, with a reappraisal of 5-HTTLPR and rs25531 , 2006, Molecular Psychiatry.

[47]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[48]  A. Caspi,et al.  Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene , 2003, Science.

[49]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. , 1999 .

[50]  J. Belsky,et al.  Theory testing, effect-size evaluation, and differential susceptibility to rearing influence: the case of mothering and attachment. , 1997, Child development.

[51]  P Riederer,et al.  Allelic Variation of Human Serotonin Transporter Gene Expression , 1996, Journal of neurochemistry.

[52]  N. Bolger,et al.  A framework for studying personality in the stress process. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Shirley A. Miller,et al.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  E. Thompson Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[55]  M. Houben,et al.  The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  A. Bartlett Daily Life , 2015 .

[57]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Why researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale. , 2012 .

[58]  P. Kuppens,et al.  Emotional inertia prospectively predicts the onset of depressive disorder in adolescence. , 2012, Emotion.

[59]  J. Flint,et al.  Mapping regulatory variants for the serotonin transporter gene based on allelic expression imbalance , 2007, Molecular Psychiatry.

[60]  S. Folkman,et al.  Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status , 1982 .

[61]  B. Ellis,et al.  Printed in the United States of America DOI: 10.10170S0954579405050145 , 2022 .