Visual Analysis on Knowledge Management Research Using Citespace

In recent years, research on knowledge management has become a hot issue in academia and industry. From the research literature of existing scholars on knowledge management, although research in this field has yielded a large amount of important research results, however, there is a lack of quantitative literature review to summarize the current status and development of the field. Most studies lack in-depth and extensional research on the basis of predecessors. This paper uses the bibliometric method to conduct statistical analysis of the literature in the field of knowledge management research, perform visualized analysis of the content of knowledge management research with citespace software, aiming to further understand the development of knowledge management research through analysis of relevant literature, frontier hotspots and future trends. The results of the research show: knowledge management research enters explosive development stage; Interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research will gradually become the direction of development in this field; the integration of knowledge management and big data will become future research trend.

[1]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Information Technology Relatedness, Knowledge Management Capability, and Performance of Multibusiness Firms , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Seokhwa Yun,et al.  A Social Exchange Perspective of Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Sharing: Investigating the Moderating Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfillment and Self-Enhancement Motive , 2019 .

[3]  Paul W. P. J. Grefen,et al.  A reference model-based user requirements elicitation process: Toward operational business-IT alignment in a co-creation value network , 2019, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[4]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Dmitriy Babichenko,et al.  Developing and piloting a serious game to educate children about over‐the‐counter medication safety , 2019, Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research.

[6]  Heeseok Lee,et al.  Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Kun Chang Lee,et al.  KMPI: measuring knowledge management performance , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Raffaele Lafortezza,et al.  From “red” to green? A look into the evolution of green spaces in a post-socialist city , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[9]  Shengji Luan,et al.  Application of multi-criteria-decision approach for the analysis of medical waste management systems in Myanmar , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Survey , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[11]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[12]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[13]  Anja Tekic,et al.  Co-creation – child, sibling or adopted cousin of open innovation? , 2018, Innovation.

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[15]  Jing-Wen Huang,et al.  Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity , 2009 .

[16]  Zhe George Zhang,et al.  Organizational learning: Approximation of multiple-level learning and forgetting by an aggregated single-level model , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..