Building competitive advantage: innovation and corporate governance in European construction

This paper explores the relationship between corporate governance and innovation. This is examined through detailed interviews with the largest contractors in five European countries. The ability to undertake research and development in production technologies by contractors differs widely across different countries. This may be explained by the extent to which strategic control is in the hands of those who have the incentives and abilities to allocate resources to uncertain and irreversible investments in innovation. This is influenced by particular features of firm ownership, organisational and management structure, internal mechanisms to diffuse knowledge and links to external sources of knowledge.

[1]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[2]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Implementation of construction innovations , 2000 .

[3]  Andrew Tylecote,et al.  Corporate Governance, Innovation Systems and Industrial Performance , 1999 .

[4]  C. Mallin.  Financial Institutions and their Relations with Corporate Boards , 1999 .

[5]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[6]  Mary O’Sullivan,et al.  Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany , 2002 .

[7]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[8]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[9]  Frens Pries,et al.  Innovation in the construction industry: the dominant role of the environment , 1995 .

[10]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Builders as sources of construction innovation , 1993 .

[11]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[12]  Graham Winch,et al.  Zephyrs of creative destruction: understanding the management of innovation in construction , 1998 .

[13]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[14]  J. Weimer,et al.  A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance , 1999 .

[15]  E. Sarah Slaughter,et al.  Models of Construction Innovation , 1998 .

[16]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[17]  William Lazonick,et al.  Organization, Finance and International Competition , 1996 .

[18]  Mary O’Sullivan,et al.  The innovative enterprise and corporate governance , 2000 .

[19]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[20]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[21]  M. Ball.  Housing and construction: A troubled relationship? , 1996 .

[22]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  Boards and Company Performance ‐ Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom , 1994 .

[23]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[24]  Michael Ball,et al.  Rebuilding Construction (Routledge Revivals): Economic Change in the British Construction Industry , 1988 .

[25]  J. Groenewegen.  About Double Organized Markets: Issues of Competition and Cooperation. the Dutch Construction Cartel: An Illustration , 1994 .

[26]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[27]  Marcela Miozzo,et al.  Restructuring in the British Construction Industry: Implications of Recent Changes in Project Management and Technology , 1998 .

[28]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[29]  R. Nelson,et al.  Government and technical progress : a cross-industry analysis , 1983 .

[30]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[31]  David M. Gann,et al.  Innovation in the Construction Sector , 1995 .