The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Robert N Weinreb | Christopher Bowd | Sonia Jain | Pamela A Sample | Linda M Zangwill | Felipe A Medeiros | Lyne Racette | F. Medeiros | L. Zangwill | R. Weinreb | C. Bowd | P. Sample | K. Ernstrom | Sonia Jain | L. Racette | Karin B Ernstrom
[1] G. Wollstein,et al. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1998, Ophthalmology.
[2] J. Jonas,et al. Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[3] M. Nicolela,et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. , 2003, Ophthalmology.
[4] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.
[5] N. Swindale,et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[6] Luca Rossetti,et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. , 2002, Ophthalmology.
[7] E. B. Wilson. Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .
[8] E. DeLong,et al. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.
[9] G. Samsa,et al. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] F. Medeiros,et al. Optic Nerve Imaging: Recent Advances , 2004 .
[11] F. Medeiros,et al. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.
[12] W Leisenring,et al. A marginal regression modelling framework for evaluating medical diagnostic tests. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.
[13] Jost B Jonas,et al. GEE approaches to marginal regression models for medical diagnostic tests , 2004, Statistics in medicine.
[14] S. Zeger,et al. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .
[15] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: III. How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test: B. What Are the Results and Will They Help Me In Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .
[16] A. Coleman,et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[17] Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. , 1994, Ophthalmology.
[18] L. Zangwill,et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.
[19] J. Koppens. Essentials in Ophthalmology: Glaucoma , 2008 .
[20] F. Medeiros,et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[21] R. Ritch,et al. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.
[22] F. Horn,et al. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph , 1998, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.
[23] R. Newcombe. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.
[24] C. Langlotz. Fundamental measures of diagnostic examination performance: usefulness for clinical decision making and research. , 2003, Radiology.
[25] S. Drance,et al. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. , 1997, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).
[26] G. Guyatt,et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.
[27] Robert N Weinreb,et al. Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: the effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[28] P A Sample,et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. , 1998, Journal of glaucoma.
[29] J. Jonas,et al. Interobserver variability of optic disk variables measured by confocal scanning laser tomography. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.
[30] P. Artes,et al. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.