Solar-induced fluorescence retrievals in the context of physiological, environmental, and hardware-based sources of uncertainty

The terrestrial biosphere is a crucial sink for anthropogenic emissions of carbon to the atmosphere, but is also the source of the largest uncertainties in estimated global carbon budgets. Numerous tower- and satellite-based platforms have recently been established to measure solar-induced fluorescence (SIF), which, as a proxy for photosynthesis, shows great promise for constraining global estimates of gross primary productivity. Nonetheless, published SIF retrievals span two orders of magnitude, illustrating an opportunity for improved characterization of the SIF signal in the context of instrument noise, detector calibrations and limitations, viewing geometry, and typical signal magnitude. In 2017, the Forested Optical Reference for Evaluating Sensor Technology (FOREST) site was established at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) as a test-bed for SIF instrument intercomparison and calibration methods development. Further, we empirically characterize the physiological and ecological meaning of SIF by directly linking to carbon exchange with an extensive suite of ground measurements. Following optimizations to our SIF spectrometer deployment, we find that deviations from ideal measurement conditions, including low light or intermittent cloud cover, introduce significant noise outside even dramatic physiological manipulations. It is critical that common standards are developed for SIF measurement systems to ensure validation of data quality and clear linkages to physiological and biophysical parameters. SIF is a promising technique to improve measurement and understanding of local to global trends in primary productivity, but data quality control is a key challenge to tackle with the rapid deployment of new sensors across the globe. This work is an initial evaluation of sensitivities of SIF signals to hardware and methodologies.

[1]  G. Wohlfahrt,et al.  The World is Not Flat: Implications for the Global Carbon Balance , 2014 .

[2]  M. Migliavacca,et al.  Angle matters: Bidirectional effects impact the slope of relationship between gross primary productivity and sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence from Orbiting Carbon Observatory‐2 across biomes , 2018, Global change biology.

[3]  Gregory Duveiller,et al.  Spatially downscaling sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence leads to an improved temporal correlation with gross primary productivity , 2016 .

[4]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Review of methods and applications , 2009 .

[5]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Effect of environmental conditions on the relationship between solar‐induced fluorescence and gross primary productivity at an OzFlux grassland site , 2017 .

[6]  G. Asner,et al.  Drought stress and carbon uptake in an Amazon forest measured with spaceborne imaging spectroscopy. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Micol Rossini,et al.  A Method for Uncertainty Assessment of Passive Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Retrieval Using an Infrared Reference Light , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  H. Walz Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges , 2014 .

[9]  N. Coops,et al.  Global Spatial–Temporal Variability in Terrestrial Productivity and Phenology Regimes between 2000 and 2012 , 2017 .

[10]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Prospects for Chlorophyll Fluorescence Remote Sensing from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 , 2014 .

[11]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[12]  Lawrence A. Corp,et al.  Comparison of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Estimates Obtained from Four Portable Field Spectroradiometers , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization , 2016 .

[14]  A M Michalak,et al.  Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[15]  K Maxwell,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  K. Davis,et al.  North America ’ s net terrestrial carbon exchange with the atmosphere 1990 – 2009 , 2014 .

[17]  Andrea Cavallaro,et al.  Sensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[18]  I. Mammarella,et al.  Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence exhibits a universal relationship with gross primary productivity across a wide variety of biomes , 2019, Global change biology.

[19]  P. Ciais,et al.  Spatiotemporal patterns of terrestrial gross primary production: A review , 2015 .

[20]  P. Bozza,et al.  Leishmania infantum lipophosphoglycan induced-Prostaglandin E2 production in association with PPAR-γ expression via activation of Toll like receptors-1 and 2 , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  OCO-2 advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2017, Science.

[22]  L. Guanter,et al.  The seasonal cycle of satellite chlorophyll fluorescence observations and its relationship to vegetation phenology and ecosystem atmosphere carbon exchange , 2014 .

[23]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[24]  E. R. Polovtseva,et al.  The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database , 2013 .

[25]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Multiscale analyses of solar‐induced florescence and gross primary production , 2017 .

[26]  Xiaoliang Lu,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence tracks seasonal variations of photosynthesis from leaf to canopy in a temperate forest , 2017, Global change biology.

[27]  B. He,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence observed by OCO-2 is strongly related to gross primary productivity estimated from flux towers in temperate forests , 2018 .

[28]  J. A. Plascyk The MK II Fraunhofer Line Discriminator (FLD-II) for Airborne and Orbital Remote Sensing of Solar-Stimulated Luminescence , 1975 .

[29]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  PhotoSpec: A new instrument to measure spatially distributed red and far-red Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.