Analysis of the biological response of endothelial and fibroblast cells cultured on synthetic scaffolds with various hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratios: influence of fibronectin adsorption and conformation.

In this study we developed polymer scaffolds intended as anchorage rings for cornea prostheses among other applications, and examined their cell compatibility. In particular, a series of interconnected porous polymer scaffolds with pore sizes from 80 to 110 microns were manufactured varying the ratio of hydrophobic to hydrophilic monomeric units along the polymer chains. Further, the effects of fibronectin precoating, a physiological adhesion molecule, were tested. The interactions between the normal human fibroblast cell line MRC-5 and primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) with the scaffold surfaces were evaluated. Adhesion and growth of the cells was examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Whereas MRC-5 fibroblasts showed adhesion and spreading to the scaffolds without any precoating, HUVECs required a fibronectin precoating for adhesion and spreading. Although both cell types attached and spread on scaffold surfaces with a content of up to a 20% hydrophilic monomers, cell adhesion, spreading, and proliferation increased with increasing hydrophobicity of the substrate. This effect is likely due to better adsorption of serum proteins to hydrophobic substrates, which then facilitate cell adhesion. In fact, atomic force microscopy measurements of fibronectin on surfaces representative of our scaffolds revealed that the amount of fibronectin adsorption correlated directly with the hydrophobicity of the surface. Besides cell adhesion we also examined the inflammatory state of HUVECs in contact with the scaffolds. Typical patterns of platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 expression were observed at intercellular boarders. HUVECs adhering on the scaffolds retained their proinflammatory response potential as shown by E-selectin mRNA expression after stimulation with lipopolyssacharide (LPS). The proinflammatory activation occurred in most of the cells, thus confirming the presence of a functionally intact endothelium. Little or no expression of the proinflammatory activation markers in the absence of LPS stimulation was observed for HUVECs growing on scaffolds with up to a 20% of hydrophilic component, whereas activation of these markers was observed after stimulation. In conclusion, scaffolds containing up to 20% hydrophilic monomers exhibited excellent cell compatibility toward human fibroblast cell line MRC-5 and human endothelial cells. Atomic force microscopy confirmed that adsorbed serum proteins such as fibronectin probably accounted for the positive correlation of HUVEC adhesion and surface hydrophobicity.

[1]  J. G. Ribelles,et al.  Water-induced (nano) organization in poly(ethyl acrylate-co-hydroxyethyl acrylate) networks , 2008 .

[2]  C James Kirkpatrick,et al.  Tissue-like self-assembly in cocultures of endothelial cells and osteoblasts and the formation of microcapillary-like structures on three-dimensional porous biomaterials. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[3]  J. L. Gómez Ribelles,et al.  Substrate chemistry-dependent conformations of single laminin molecules on polymer surfaces are revealed by the phase signal of atomic force microscopy. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[4]  J. Ruiz-Moreno,et al.  Future design of a new keratoprosthesis. Physical and biological analysis of polymeric substrates for epithelial cell growth. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  J. L. Gomez Ribelles,et al.  Survival and differentiation of embryonic neural explants on different biomaterials. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  J. L. Gómez Ribelles,et al.  Response of human chondrocytes to a non-uniform distribution of hydrophilic domains on poly (ethyl acrylate-co-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) copolymers. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[7]  Julian H. George,et al.  Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface , 2005, Science.

[8]  Quan Huang,et al.  Vascularization and gene regulation of human endothelial cells growing on porous polyethersulfone (PES) hollow fiber membranes. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[9]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Endothelialization of a non-woven silk fibroin net for use in tissue engineering: growth and gene regulation of human endothelial cells. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[10]  D. Chappard,et al.  Biodegradability of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) in the presence of the J774.2 macrophage cell line. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[11]  Anthony English,et al.  The effect of hydrogel charge density on cell attachment. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[12]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  Kirsten Peters,et al.  Growth of human cells on a non-woven silk fibroin net: a potential for use in tissue engineering. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[14]  T. Russell,et al.  Surface-Responsive Materials , 2002, Science.

[15]  C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Software-supported image quantification of angiogenesis in an in vitro culture system: application to studies of biocompatibility. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[16]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Evaluation of cell behaviour related to physico-chemical properties of polymeric membranes to be used in bioartificial organs. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[17]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[18]  T V Chirila,et al.  An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[19]  P. Moghe,et al.  PEG-variant biomaterials as selectively adhesive protein templates: model surfaces for controlled cell adhesion and migration. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[20]  I. Constable,et al.  Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[21]  M. K. Magnússon,et al.  Fibronectin: structure, assembly, and cardiovascular implications. , 1998, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[22]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Effects of substratum morphology on cell physiology , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  M Deutsch,et al.  Use of fibrin glue as a substrate for in vitro endothelialization of PTFE vascular grafts. , 1989, Surgery.

[24]  P. Zilla,et al.  Precoating substrate and surface configuration determine adherence and spreading of seeded endothelial cells on polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. , 1989, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  B D Ratner,et al.  Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[26]  S. Hanson,et al.  In vitro endothelialization of small-caliber vascular grafts. , 1987, Surgery.

[27]  B. Tighe,et al.  Cellular interactions with synthetic polymer surfaces in culture. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[28]  B. Ratner,et al.  Hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers as cell substrates: Effect on 3T3 cell growth rates , 1985 .

[29]  Alan G. Walton,et al.  Structural changes in proteins adsorbed on polymer surfaces , 1980 .

[30]  E. Jaffe,et al.  Culture of human endothelial cells derived from umbilical veins. Identification by morphologic and immunologic criteria. , 1973, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[31]  Andrés J. García Interfaces to control cell-biomaterial adhesive interactions , 2006 .

[32]  J. West-Mays,et al.  The keratocyte: corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes. , 2006, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[33]  B. Nusgens,et al.  Mechano-sensing and mechano-reaction of soft connective tissue cells. , 1998, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[34]  E. Pişkin,et al.  Cell attachment to PU and PHEMA based biomaterials: Relation to structural properties , 1991 .

[35]  Michael J. Lyndon Synthetic Hydrogels as Substrata for Cell Adhesion Studies , 1986 .