Effects of target height and width on 2D pointing movement duration and kinematics.

This study examined the impact of target geometry on the trajectories of rapid pointing movements. Participants performed a graphic point-to-point task using a pen on a digitizer tablet with targets and real time trajectories displayed on a computer screen. Circular- and elliptical-shaped targets were used in order to systematically vary the accuracy constraints along two dimensions. Consistent with Fitts Law, movement time increased as target difficulty increased. Analysis of movement kinematics revealed different patterns for targets constrained by height (H) and width (W). When W was the constraining factor, movements of greater precision were characterized by a lower peak velocity and a longer deceleration phase, with trajectories that were aimed relatively farther away from the center of the target and were more variable across trials. This indicates an emphasis on reactive, sensory-based control. When H was the constraining factor, however, movements of greater precision were characterized by a longer acceleration phase, a lower peak velocity, and a longer deceleration phase. The initial trajectory was aimed closer to the center of the target, and the trajectory path across trials was more constrained. This suggests a greater reliance on both predictive and reactive control.

[1]  L Proteau,et al.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Segment interdependency and difficulty in two-stroke sequences , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Movement accuracy constraints in Parkinson’s disease patients , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  The relationship between speed and accuracy of movement aimed at a target , 1971 .

[5]  J. Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  D. Rosenbaum Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  James Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  D. Chaffin,et al.  An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  Jos J. Adam,et al.  The control of two-element, reciprocal aiming movements: Evidence for chunking , 1995 .

[10]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  The Control of Simple Movements by Multisensory Information , 1985 .

[11]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Empirical evaluation of performance models of pointing accuracy and speed with a PC mouse , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  George E Stelmach,et al.  Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[14]  Errol R. Hoffmann,et al.  Effect of varying target height in a Fitts' movement task , 1994 .

[15]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  John B. Shea,et al.  A Movement Constraint Interpretation of the Response Complexity Effect on Programming Time , 1988 .

[17]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[19]  W G Darling,et al.  A linked muscular activation model for movement generation and control. , 1987, Journal of Motor Behavior.

[20]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Julie Messier,et al.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  G. Stelmach,et al.  The influence of movement segment difficulty on movements with two-stroke sequence , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Response programming as a function of accuracy and complexity: Evidence from latency and kinematic measures , 1997 .

[24]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Extending Effective Target Width in Fitts' Law to a Two-Dimensional Pointing Task , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movement Trajectories in Fitts' Task: Implications for Control , 1987 .