Does Contour Classification Precede Contour Grouping in Perception of Partially Visible Figures?

When a figure is only partially visible and its contours represent a small fraction of total image contours (as when there is much background clutter), a fast contour classification mechanism may filter non-figure contours in order to restrict the size of the input to subsequent contour grouping mechanisms. The results of two psychophysical experiments suggest that the human visual system can classify figure from non-figure contours on the basis of a difference in some contour property (eg length, orientation, curvature, etc). While certain contour properties (eg orientation, curvature) require only local analysis for classification, other contour properties (eg length) may require more global analysis of the retinal image. We constructed a pyramid-based computational model based on these observations and performed two simulations of experiment 1: one simulation with classification enabled and the other simulation with classification disabled. The classification-based simulation gave the superior account of human performance in experiment 1. When a figure is partially visible, with few contours relative to the number of non-figure contours, contour classification followed by contour grouping can be more efficient than contour grouping alone, owing to smaller input to grouping mechanisms.

[1]  James Elder,et al.  A measure of closure , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Pyramid Framework for Early Vision , 1994 .

[3]  K A Stevens,et al.  The relation between proximity and brightness similarity in dot patterns , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Grouping by Proximity and Multistability in Dot Lattices: A Quantitative Gestalt Theory , 1995 .

[5]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Extracting Salient Curves from Images: An Analysis of the Saliency Network , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Macworth Interpreting pictures of polyhedral scenes , 1973 .

[8]  P. Kellman,et al.  Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  H Takeichi The effects of stereoscopic depth on completion , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jacob feldman,et al.  Bayesian contour integration , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Alan K. Mackworth Interpreting Pictures of Polyhedral Scenes , 1973, IJCAI.

[12]  J. Elder,et al.  Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[13]  J. Muise,et al.  Discrimination of the Shape of the Masked Inducing Figure Precedes Perception of the Illusory Triangle , 1993, Perception.

[14]  Sharon E. Guttman,et al.  Temporal variations in visual completion: a reflection of spatial limits? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Feldman Curvilinearity, covariance, and regularity in perceptual groups , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. , 1992 .

[17]  James H. Elder,et al.  Contour Grouping with Prior Models , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Y. Ejima,et al.  Bottom–Up Clues in Target Finding: Why a Dalmatian May Be Mistaken for an Elephant , 2000, Perception.

[19]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Curve Detection in a Noisy Image , 1997, Vision Research.

[20]  Indiana.,et al.  An Exponential Pyramid-Based Model of Contour Classification in Figure-Ground Segregation , 2004 .

[21]  Lance R. Williams,et al.  A Comparison of Measures for Detecting Natural Shapes in Cluttered Backgrounds , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  K Nakayama,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth: Its Relation to Image Segmentation, Grouping, and the Recognition of Occluded Objects , 1989, Perception.

[23]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Structural Saliency: The Detection Of Globally Salient Structures using A Locally Connected Network , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[24]  M. Kubovy,et al.  On the Lawfulness of Grouping by Proximity , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  S. Sutherland Seeing things , 1989, Nature.