The Social Role of Robots in the Future—Explorative Measurement of Hopes and Fears

With robot technology entering more and more our private lives, the resulting ethical impact on society gets into the focus of social robotics. The present research focuses on individuals and their hopes and objections related to the potential social roles of robots in the future: via an online questionnaire, 328 participants indicated their expectations as to when these social roles for robots will become reality (distance rating) as well as their affective judgement of these roles (valence rating). Results indicate that while judgements are overall rather negative, the negativity is associated with characteristics of the respective social role (social context, distance rating) as well as with characteristics of the participants (gender, age, professional background). The findings are discussed regarding their impact on future work, including the development of ethical guidelines for social robotics.

[1]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Emotion and sociable humanoid robots , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  T. Kanda,et al.  A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots , 2005 .

[3]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  A robotic walker that provides guidance , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[4]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  What People Assume about Humanoid and Animal-Type Robots: Cross-Cultural Analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States , 2008, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[5]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[6]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[8]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture part I: Motivation and philosophy , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[10]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[11]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Craig E Franklin,et al.  Adapting to Climate Change , 2009, Science.

[13]  George Y. Bizer,et al.  Memory-based versus on-line processing : Implications for attitude strength , 2006 .

[14]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Review of Human Studies Methods in HRI and Recommendations , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[15]  David Levy,et al.  The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[16]  I. Ajzen.  Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  Glenda Shaw-Garlock,et al.  Looking Forward to Sociable Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[18]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[19]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Towards a 3g crawling robot through the integration of microrobot technologies , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[20]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy in a Care House - Change of Relationship among the Residents and Seal Robot during a 2-month Long Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitude Research in the 21st Century: The Current State of Knowledge. , 2005 .

[22]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[23]  Natasha McCarthy,et al.  Autonomous Systems: Social, Legal and Ethical Issues , 2009 .

[24]  G. Veruggio,et al.  Roboethics: a Bottom-up Interdisciplinary Discourse in the Field of Applied Ethics in Robotics , 2006 .

[25]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Ratings-Based versus Choice-Based Latent Class Conjoint Models , 1998 .

[26]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[27]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots , 2009 .

[28]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Rating-based versus choice-based latent class conjoint models - an emperical comparison , 1998 .