Advancing professionalization in human simulation: perspectives of SP educators from around the world on the Association of SP Educators Standards of Best Practice

Between 2013 and 2017, the Association of SP Educators (ASPE), a global organization of educators dedicated to the work of human simulation, developed Standards of Best Practice (SOBP) for working with human role players in simulation. These individuals are known by diverse terms, including simulated or standardized patients or participants (SPs). This study had two aims: (1) to understand the ways in which the ASPE SOBP are relevant to the practices of SP educators around the world, and (2) to identify improvements to the ASPE SOBP from a global perspective. This qualitative study was undertaken between January 2020 and July 2022. Subjects consented to audio-recorded interviews. A collaborative, inductive coding approach was adopted, followed by thematic analysis, aligned with the methods described by Braun and Clarke. Themes were further updated following reflexive conversations amongst the investigators at meetings over the course of several months and were aligned with the study aims. Twelve SP educators from six continents participated. Four primary themes were identified (each with multiple subthemes): influencing SP educator practices; advancing professionalization; identifying challenges to implementation; and bridging gaps in the ASPE SOBP. A diverse group of SP educators from around the world identified the ASPE SOBP in general as relevant and applicable to their practice. The standards provided both guidance and flexibility for working with SPs in a safe, effective and quality-based way. At the same time there were challenges noted and recommendations made that can help to inform future iterations of the standards.

[1]  J. Maxworthy,et al.  The state of distance healthcare simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an international survey , 2022, Advances in Simulation.

[2]  Kelly L. Rossler,et al.  Onward and Upward: Introducing the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM , 2021, Clinical Simulation in Nursing.

[3]  C. Bohnert,et al.  Diversity and inclusion in simulation: addressing ethical and psychological safety concerns when working with simulated participants , 2021, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[4]  Christine S Park,et al.  SP safety, autonomy and healthcare simulation practice in the COVID-19 era , 2021, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[5]  V. Braun,et al.  Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches , 2020 .

[6]  A. Kumar,et al.  A toolbox for conducting an online OSCE , 2020, The clinical teacher.

[7]  J. Rethans,et al.  Manifesto for healthcare simulation practice , 2020, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[8]  D. Nestel,et al.  Power and adolescent simulated patients: A qualitative exploration. , 2020, Nurse education in practice.

[9]  L. Sokoloff,et al.  Collaborative framework for working with older simulated participants (SP) , 2020, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[10]  Y. Li,et al.  Preparing and responding to 2019 novel coronavirus with simulation and technology-enhanced learning for healthcare professionals: challenges and opportunities in China , 2020, BMJ Simulation and Tecnnology Enhanced Learning.

[11]  Cathy M Smith,et al.  “Please let me know when I do not realize it myself”: a qualitative analysis of senior simulated patients’ experiences , 2019, Advances in Simulation.

[12]  C. Bohnert,et al.  Certification, accreditation and professional standards: striving to define competency, a response to ASPiH Standards for Simulation-Based Education: Process of Consultation, Design and Implementation , 2018, BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.

[13]  D. Nestel,et al.  Creating a quality improvement culture in standardized/simulated patient methodology: the role of professional societies , 2017, Advances in Simulation.

[14]  G. Gliva-McConvey,et al.  The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP) , 2017, Advances in Simulation.

[15]  Lalena M Yarris,et al.  Telesimulation: An Innovative Tool for Health Professions Education , 2017, AEM education and training.

[16]  D. Nestel,et al.  A systematic review: Children & Adolescents as simulated patients in health professional education , 2016, Advances in Simulation.

[17]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Women's participation in the medical profession: insights from experiences in Japan, Scandinavia, Russia, and Eastern Europe. , 2014, Journal of women's health.

[18]  V. Braun,et al.  What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? , 2014, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being.

[19]  N. McNaughton,et al.  Key challenges in simulated patient programs: An international comparative case study , 2011, BMC medical education.

[20]  D. Roter,et al.  A nationwide survey of standardized patients: who they are, what they do, and how they experience their work. , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[21]  Lisa D Howley,et al.  Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature: review and recommendations , 2008, Medical education.

[22]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[23]  Catherine F. Nicholas,et al.  Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Implementing Best Practices in Standardized Patient Methodology , 2020 .

[24]  V. Braun,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology , 2022 .