Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS

Although past research has sought to identify the factors of student engagement in traditional online courses, two questions remained largely unanswered with regard to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): do the factors that could influence student engagement in traditional online courses also apply to online courses that are massive and open? What factors do students consider important in terms of their perceived ability to promote a satisfying or engaging online learning experience? This paper reports a case study of three top-rated MOOCs in the disciplines of programming languages, literature, and arts & design in order to address these very questions. Using a mixed methods approach that combines participant observation with analysis of reflection data from 965 course participants, this paper seeks to understand the factors behind the popularity of these MOOCs. Five factors were found. These include the following, ranked in terms of importance: (1) problem-centric learning with clear expositions, (2) instructor accessibility and passion, (3) active learning, (4) peer interaction, and (5) using helpful course resources. The specific design strategies pertaining to each factor are further discussed in this paper. These strategies can provide useful guidance for instructors and are a worthwhile subject for further experimental validation.

[1]  Scott Rixner,et al.  Facilitating human interaction in an online programming course , 2014, SIGCSE.

[2]  B. Williams,et al.  Operations management. , 2001, Optometry.

[3]  A. Bangert.  The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[5]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[6]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[7]  David Clarke,et al.  Cognitive engagement in the Mathematics Classroom , 2001 .

[8]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[9]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC. , 2016 .

[10]  James J. Appleton,et al.  Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. , 2008 .

[11]  Roy Williams,et al.  The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC , 2010 .

[12]  Karen H. Larwin,et al.  Identification with School and Head Trauma: Parental Perceptions on Student's Experiences , 2015 .

[13]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[14]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[15]  R. Prinz,et al.  School Bonding in Children and Adolescents: Conceptualization, Assessment, and Associated Variables , 2003, Clinical child and family psychology review.

[16]  Shui-fong Lam,et al.  Understanding student engagement with a contextual model , 2012 .

[17]  David E. Pritchard,et al.  Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX's First MOOC. , 2013 .

[18]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Maha Bali,et al.  MOOC Pedagogy: Gleaning Good Practice from Existing MOOCs , 2014 .

[20]  Björn Hartmann,et al.  Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system? , 2014, CSCW.

[21]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[22]  Sara Battin-Pearson,et al.  Long-Term Effects of the Seattle Social Development Intervention on School Bonding Trajectories , 2001, Applied developmental science.

[23]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Why Students Contribute in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2008 .

[24]  H. M. Marks,et al.  Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years , 2000 .

[25]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[26]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[27]  T. Kindermann,et al.  Engagement and Disaffection in the Classroom: Part of a Larger Motivational Dynamic? , 2008 .

[28]  J. Reeve.  A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement , 2012 .

[29]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[30]  Anant Agarwal,et al.  6.002 Circuits and Electronics, Fall 2000 , 2000 .

[31]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[32]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Towards a Model of Engaging Online Students: Lessons from MOOCs and Four Policy Documents , 2015 .

[33]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[34]  Andrew K. Shenton.  Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects , 2004, Educ. Inf..

[35]  Charles W. Darr,et al.  Measuring Student Engagement: The Development of a Scale for Formative Use , 2012 .

[36]  Dimitrios Thanasoulas,et al.  What is Learner Autonomy and How Can It Be Fostered ? , 2009 .

[37]  Linda Corrin,et al.  Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs , 2014, LAK.

[38]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[39]  Nicole E. Werner,et al.  Affiliative motivation, school attachment, and aggression in school , 2006 .

[40]  Antoine Doucet,et al.  Building engagement for MOOC students: introducing support for time management on online learning platforms , 2014, WWW.

[41]  Steve Cooper,et al.  Reflections on Stanford's MOOCs , 2013, CACM.