Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?

[1]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of the Number of Teeth and Location of the Virtual Occlusal Record on the Accuracy of the Maxillo-Mandibular Relationship Obtained By Using An Intraoral Scanner. , 2022, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  J. Güth,et al.  Influence of intraoral conditions on the accuracy of full-arch scans by Cerec Primescan AC: an in vitro and in vivo comparison. , 2022, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[3]  S. Rues,et al.  Effect of scan-path length on the scanning accuracy of completely dentate and partially edentulous maxillae. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. , 2022, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  Sakaorat Pattamavilai,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  O. Urquhart,et al.  Intraoral scanners: An American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators Panel survey. , 2021, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[8]  K. Oh,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Accuracy of Dental CAD Programs in Designing a Fixed Partial Denture. , 2021, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[9]  M. Wichmann,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods. , 2021, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[10]  Yong Wang,et al.  Construction of virtual intercuspal occlusion: considering tooth displacement. , 2021, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[11]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of An Intraoral Scanner. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[12]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Lighting Conditions on the Mesh Quality of an Intraoral Scanner. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[13]  F. Nejatidanesh,et al.  Marginal adaptation of zirconia complete-coverage fixed dental restorations made from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  A. Hannam,et al.  Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records. , 2020, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[17]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  Ji-Man Park,et al.  Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  Faraj Edher,et al.  The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning , 2018, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  T. Attin,et al.  Accuracy of Buccal Scan Procedures for the Registration of Habitual Intercuspation. , 2018, Operative dentistry.

[21]  Keng Mun Wong,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models—Part II: Effect of Model Scanner‐CAD Systems and Articulation Method , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[22]  Keng Mun Wong,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models – Part I: System Trueness and Precision , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[23]  K. Tan,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Static Interocclusal Registration by Three Intraoral Scanner Systems , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[24]  S. Heo,et al.  Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  H. Yatani,et al.  Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[26]  Hong Li,et al.  Influence of object translucency on the scanning accuracy of a powder‐free intraoral scanner: A laboratory study , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  Ji-Man Park,et al.  Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form , 2016, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[28]  S. Heo,et al.  Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  J. Katsoulis,et al.  Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. , 2016, Quintessence international.

[30]  G. Pradíes,et al.  Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[31]  Eneko Solaberrieta,et al.  Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[32]  A. Mehl,et al.  Reproducibility of habitual intercuspation in vivo. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  I. Schmidtmann,et al.  Digital 3D image of bimaxillary casts connected by a vestibular scan , 2013, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[34]  Toyohiko Hayashi,et al.  Computer-aided determination of occlusal contact points for dental 3-D CAD , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[35]  James S Hodges,et al.  Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.