Frame-Rich, Frame-Poor: An Investigation of the Contingent Effects of Media Frame Diversity and Individual Differences on Audience Frame Diversity

An audience's interpretation of news is considered to involve the input of news frames and audience predispositions. This study proposes that media frame diversity and individual-level factors may both condition audience issue cognitions. Using two public issues in Taiwan that vary in news frame diversity and data from a sample survey, this study compares media and audience frames and examines factors that condition audience framing. Results show that media frame diversity corresponds to audience frame diversity at the aggregate level. Audience frames are more diverse in the more diverse news context, but are less diverse in the more uniform news context. Individual differences also affect audience framing. Education appears to be a strong predictor to audience frame diversity as more education increases audience frame diversity in both issue contexts. Other individual variables show differential effects on audience framing across the two issues. Overall, the findings suggest that, while effects of individual-level factors on broadening audience perspectives may vary with issues, diverse media frames may help to cultivate a more reflexive citizenry.

[1]  J. Groshek Homogenous Agendas, Disparate Frames: CNN and CNN International Coverage Online , 2008 .

[2]  M. McCombs,et al.  CAPACITY, DIVERSITY, AND VOLATILITY OF THE PUBLIC AGENDA TRENDS FROM 1954 TO 1994 , 1995 .

[3]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  Switching Trains of Thought , 1997 .

[4]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  Media Rich, Media Poor: Two Studies of Diversity in Agenda-Holding , 1977 .

[5]  D. Rucinski The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[6]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[7]  Jay G. Blumler,et al.  Television and the public interest : vulnerable values in West European broadcasting , 1991 .

[8]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  When More Media Equals Less News: Patterns of Content Homogenization in Argentina's Leading Print and Online Newspapers , 2007 .

[9]  Todd Gitlin The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left , 1980 .

[10]  M. McCombs,et al.  A COMPARISON OF FACTORS INFLUENCING ISSUE DIVERSITY IN THE U.S. AND TAIWAN , 1995 .

[11]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[13]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  The Effects of News Frames on Readers' Thoughts and Recall , 1999 .

[14]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[15]  Gaye Tuchman Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality , 1978 .

[16]  Matthew N. Beckmann,et al.  A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government , 2001 .

[17]  Denis McQuail,et al.  Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest , 1992 .

[18]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[19]  F. Izcaray,et al.  Nominal Agenda Diversity in a Media-Rich, Less-Developed Society , 1988 .

[20]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Reliability of Content Analysis ; The Case of Nominal Scale Cording , 1955 .

[21]  Melvin J. Voigt,et al.  Progress in Communication Sciences , 1982 .

[22]  Mark R. Joslyn,et al.  Gun Policy, Opinion, Tragedy, and Blame Attribution: The Conditional Influence of Issue Frames , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[23]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[24]  C. Levitt,et al.  "The Whole World Is Watching": Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left , 1981 .

[25]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[26]  Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem,et al.  National identity and cultural values: Broadcasting safeguards , 1987 .

[27]  S. Iyengar Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[28]  J. Peter,et al.  Agenda rich, agenda poor: A cross-national comparative investigation of nominal and thematic public agenda diversity , 2003 .

[29]  M. McCombs A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[30]  Joe Bob Hester,et al.  The Economy and Second-Level Agenda Setting: A Time-Series Analysis of Economic News and Public Opinion about the Economy , 2003 .

[31]  Guy J. Golan,et al.  Second-Level Agenda Setting in the New Hampshire Primary: A Comparison of Coverage in Three Newspapers and Public Perceptions of Candidates , 2001 .

[32]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents , 1991 .

[33]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[34]  D. Mckie,et al.  Talking Politics , 1975, The Lancet.