Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder?

[1]  M. Ottinger Birds , 1991, Experimental Gerontology.

[2]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies: studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  G. Murphy,et al.  Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  U. Neisser Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization , 1989 .

[5]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  I. Biederman,et al.  Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. , 1987 .

[7]  P. Shaver,et al.  Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[9]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Measuring the Structure of Expertise , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[11]  L. Barsalou Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  O. John,et al.  Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. , 1985 .

[13]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[14]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[15]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Pictures and names: Making the connection , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Correlated properties in natural categories , 1984 .

[17]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Basic-level superiority in picture categorization , 1982 .

[18]  C. Mervis,et al.  Order of acquisition of subordinate-, basic-, and superordinate-level categories. , 1982 .

[19]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[21]  Janet W. D. Dougherty,et al.  Salience and relativity in classification , 1978 .

[22]  D. Cruse The pragmatics of lexical specificity , 1977, Journal of Linguistics.

[23]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Brian Stross,et al.  VI. ACQUISITION OF BOTANICAL TERMINOLOGY BY TZELTAL CHILDREN , 1973 .

[25]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[26]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1989 .

[27]  C. Mervis Child-basic object categories and early lexical development. , 1987 .

[28]  H. Brownell,et al.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[30]  G. Murphy,et al.  Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices. , 1984 .

[31]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[32]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[33]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[34]  J. Segui,et al.  [Verbal reaction time. 3. Specific responses and categoric responses to stimulus objects]. , 1968, L'annee psychologique.

[35]  R. Brown How shall a thing be called. , 1958, Psychological review.