Do foreign language learners also have constructions

In Construction Grammar, the ultimate grammatical unit is the construction, a conventionalized form-meaning pairing. We present interrelated evidence from three different methods, all of which speak in favor of attributing an ontological status to constructions for non-native speakers of English. Firstly, in a sentence-fragment completion study with German learners of English, we obtained a significant priming effect between constructions. Secondly, these priming effects correlate strongly with the verb-construction preferences in native speaker corpora: verbs which are strongly associated with one construction resist priming to another semantically compatible construction; more importantly, the priming effects do not correlate with verb-construction preferences from German translation equivalents, ruling out a translational explanation. Thirdly, in order to rule out an alternative account in terms of syntactic rather than constructional priming, we present semantic evidence obtained by a sorting study, showing that subjects exhibited a strong tendency towards a construction-based sorting, which even reflects recent explanations of how constructions are related.

[1]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms , 1984 .

[2]  J. K. Bock Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[4]  A. Goldberg Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[5]  G. Murphy,et al.  Induction and category coherence , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Beyond Names for Things: Young Children's Acquisition of Verbs , 1997 .

[7]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[8]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition. , 1997 .

[9]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Return of Constructions , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[11]  Maria Lapata,et al.  Acquiring Lexical Generalizations from Corpora: A Case Study for Diathesis Alternations , 1999, ACL.

[12]  Sabine Schulte im Walde Clustering Verbs Semantically According to their Alternation Behaviour , 2000, COLING.

[13]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning , 2000 .

[14]  Frank Keller,et al.  Verb Frame Frequency as a Predictor of Verb Bias , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? , 2003, Cognition.

[17]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Structural priming across languages , 2003 .

[18]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[19]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  S. Gries,et al.  Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on `alternations' , 2004 .

[21]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English , 2005 .

[22]  S. Gries Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  Sabine Schulte im Walde Experiments on the Automatic Induction of German Semantic Verb Classes , 2006, CL.

[24]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Structural priming: Purely syntactic? , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.