Organizational Innovations in a Long-Term Perspective: Legitimacy and Souls-of-Fire as Critical Factors of Change and Viability

What may be learned from organizational innovations in a long-term perspective? This article is based on eight studies over a period of 10-20 years. An insurance department is used as an illustrative and representative case. The department manager was a successful soul-of-fire (i.e., champion) during the change process. The continuous defense of the organization's values and culture distanced him from the rest of the company. Legitimacy (especially top management acceptance) is something that has to be continuously regenerated. The soul-of-fire faces two major dilemmas: first, the learning dilemma, i.e., the need to balance the efforts for internal learning and development in the unit with diffusion activities and the creation of external legitimacy; second, the change dilemma, i.e., the need to balance the direction and control of change with support for employee autonomy and influence.

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  P. Blumberg,et al.  Industrial democracy: The sociology of participation , 1968 .

[3]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  New Patterns of Work Reform: The Case of Norway , 1985 .

[4]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution , 1986 .

[5]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe , 1979 .

[6]  B. Gustavsen,et al.  From Linear to Interactive Logics: Characteristics of Workplace Development as Illustrated by Projects in Large Mail Centers , 1991 .

[7]  J W Slocum,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Productivity , 1971 .

[8]  R. Kanter The change masters : innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation , 1984 .

[9]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .

[10]  Stelios Kafandaris The Limits to Democratic Planning , 1978 .

[11]  E. Miller Socio-Technical Systems in Weaving, 1953-1970: A Follow-up Study , 1975 .

[12]  B. Stymne Design Principles for a Participative Organization of Work Some Conclusions from the URAF Experiments , 1980 .

[13]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  The Organizational Life Cycle , 1981 .

[14]  T. Sandberg Work Organization and Autonomous Groups , 1982 .

[15]  M. E. Philips,et al.  Dialog och uppslutning : Arbetsorganisatorisk förnyelse i industriarbetet , 1990 .

[16]  Torbjörn Stjernberg,et al.  The Change Process of Innovative Work Designs: New Design and Redesign in Sweden, Canada, and the U.S. , 1986 .

[17]  Ph G. Herbst,et al.  Alternatives to hierarchies , 1976 .

[18]  Job design and industrial democracy , 1976 .

[19]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[20]  Elliott Jaques The changing culture of a factory , 1951 .

[21]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[22]  Richard J. Schonberger,et al.  World Class Manufacturing Casebook: Implementing Jit and Tqc , 1987 .

[23]  Per H. Engelstad,et al.  The Design of Conferences and the Evolving Role of Democratic Dialogue in Changing Working Life , 1986 .