Service Architecture and Modularity

An understanding of the nature of service architecture and modularity is crucial to service design and innovation. Two sets of approaches are developed that further our understanding and support decision making. First is a systematic decomposition approach to architecture modeling that allows organizations to understand their current architecture, evaluate alternative architectures, and identify key interfaces between different parts of the service. Second, the article develops a service modularity function (SMF), a mathematical model indicating the degree of modularity deriving from unique services and the degree to which the modules can be replicated across a variety of services. Three areas are identified that can contribute to competitiveness: the possession of unique service modules or elements not easily copied in the short term by competitors; the ability to exploit these through replication across multiple services and/or multiple sites; and the presence of a degree of modularity, which in turn supports both customization and rapid new product development. The SMF can support decision making in the design of services and the exploitation of service innovation. In particular, the relationship between architecture and modularity and the roles of service contact personnel in the customization of services is shown to be complementary. It is proposed that service customization can be either combinatorial (the combination of a set of service processes and products to create a unique service) or menu driven (the selection of one or more services from a set of existing services/products to meet customer needs).

[1]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Toward a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  J. A. Fitzsimmons.  Service Management , 2003 .

[3]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Capturing the Degree of Modularity Embedded in Product Architectures , 2006 .

[4]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Service Customization Through Employee Adaptiveness , 2005 .

[5]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Agility in Retail Banking: A Numerical Taxonomy of Strategic Service Groups , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[6]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter‐firm learning , 2003 .

[7]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[8]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[9]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Managing the transition from products to services , 2003, International Journal of Service Industry Management.

[10]  Scott W. Kelley,et al.  Discretion and the Service Employee , 1993 .

[11]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[12]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[13]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[14]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[15]  Bert Meijboom,et al.  Modular care and service packages for independent living elderly , 2010 .

[16]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Management of Product Architecture Modularity for Mass Customization: Modeling and Theoretical Considerations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[18]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[19]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency , 1998 .

[20]  John R. Weisz,et al.  Modularity in the design and application of therapeutic interventions , 2005 .

[21]  Jan Willem de Vries,et al.  Structuring front office and back office work in service delivery systems: An empirical study of three design decisions , 2007 .

[22]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Creating a platform-based approach for developing new services , 2001 .

[23]  Cynthia Rettig.  The Trouble With Enterprise Software , 2007 .

[24]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Principles for User Design of Customized Products , 2005 .

[25]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions , 2005 .

[26]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration , 2002 .

[27]  M. Jacobides.  Industry Change Through Vertical Dis-Integration: How and Why Markets Emerged in Mortgage Banking , 2004 .

[28]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[29]  Zeinep Aksin Karaesman,et al.  Effective strategies for internal outsourcing and offshoring of business services: An empirical investigation , 2008 .

[30]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation , 2007 .

[31]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Applying platform design to improve the integration of patient services across the continuum of care , 2007 .

[33]  Qiang Tu,et al.  Measuring Modularity-Based Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Mass Customization Capability: A Customer-Driven Perspective , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[34]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[35]  R. Rust,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Productivity, and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services , 1997 .

[36]  A. Roth,et al.  INSIGHTS INTO SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT: A RESEARCH AGENDA , 2003 .