Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall
暂无分享,去创建一个
Penny M. Pexman | Ian S. Hargreaves | Jeremy C. Johnson | Lenka Zdrazilova | P. Pexman | Jeremy C. S. Johnson | L. Zdrazilova
[1] Alexandre Gaudeul. An Experimental Study of Memory. , 1921 .
[2] M. Glanzer,et al. Two storage mechanisms in free recall , 1966 .
[3] John G. Seamon,et al. Depth of processing in recall and recognition memory: Differential effects of stimulus meaningfulness and serial position. , 1976 .
[4] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[5] The Effects of Concreteness on Memory: Dual Codes or Dual Processing? , 1996 .
[6] D. Balota,et al. Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words , 2009 .
[7] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[8] Ken McRae,et al. Semantic Memory: Some Insights from Feature-Based Connectionist Attractor Networks , 2004 .
[9] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[10] Matthew Flatt,et al. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .
[11] Eli Saltz,et al. Specifying the Mechanisms in a Levels-of-Processing Approach to Memory. , 1976 .
[12] George S. Cree,et al. Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[13] Michael Wilson,et al. MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .
[14] P. Pexman,et al. Number-of-features effects and semantic processing , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[15] Kenneth Gilhooly,et al. Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 five-letter words having single-solution anagrams , 1977 .
[16] Gün R. Semin,et al. Retrieval contexts and the concreteness effect: Dissociations in memory for concrete and abstract words , 2005 .
[17] F. Craik,et al. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research , 1972 .
[18] C. Beal,et al. Image detail and recall: evidence for within-item elaboration. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[19] J. Bastian,et al. Recall of abstract and concrete words equated for meaningfulness , 1966 .
[20] M. Kahana. Associative retrieval processes in free recall , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[21] F. Craik,et al. Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .
[22] T. O. Nelson. Repetition and depth of processing , 1977 .
[23] J. Carroll,et al. Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .
[24] B. Ross. The more, the better?: Number of decisions as a determinant of memorability , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[25] J. Eich. Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. , 1985, Psychological review.
[26] Thomas A. Schreiber,et al. The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[27] K. McRae,et al. Shared Features Dominate Semantic Richness Effects for Concrete Concepts. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.
[28] A. Paivio,et al. Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? , 1973 .
[29] Ian S. Hargreaves,et al. There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[30] James L. McClelland,et al. The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.
[31] Marc W Howard,et al. A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. , 2008, Psychological review.
[32] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .
[33] John D. Bransford,et al. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .
[34] Jason D. Ozubko,et al. The mixed truth about frequency effects on free recall: Effects of study list composition , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[35] Brian Litt,et al. Gamma Oscillations Distinguish True From False Memories , 2007, Psychological science.
[36] T. Landauer,et al. A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .
[37] P. Schwanenflugel,et al. Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words , 1992, Memory & cognition.
[38] A. Yonelinas,et al. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[39] David A. Gallo,et al. Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task , 2008 .
[40] Robert S. Lockhart,et al. CHARM is not enough: Comments on Eich's model of cued recall. , 1986 .
[41] Yasushi Hino,et al. The impact of feedback semantics in visual word recognition: Number-of-features effects in lexical decision and naming tasks , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[42] A. Paivio,et al. Concreteness effects on memory: when and why? , 1994 .
[43] W. F. Battig,et al. Handbook of semantic word norms , 1978 .
[44] S. Hashtroudi,et al. Type of semantic elaboration and recall , 1983, Memory & cognition.
[45] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[46] Suparna Rajaram,et al. The Concreteness Effect in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests , 2001 .
[47] Penny M. Pex. There are many ways to be rich: Effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition , 2008 .
[48] Marc W Howard,et al. When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval , 2002 .
[49] Sean M. Polyn,et al. Semantic cuing and the scale insensitivity of recency and contiguity. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[50] Thomas A. Schreiber,et al. Word concreteness and word structure as independent determinants of recall , 1992 .
[51] F. Craik,et al. Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .