GEOMETRICALLY NON‐LINEAR BEAM ELEMENT FOR DYNAMICS SIMULATION OF MULTIBODY SYSTEMS

SUMMARY The main objective of the present paper is to derive an explicit expression for the stiffness term in the dynamics equations of an elastic beam based on the non-linear kinematics of deformation. In particular, we develop a closed-form expression for the non-linear stiffness matrix which operates on the total elastic deformations to give the vector of internal forces. The derivation begins with the description of the deformation field and the exact non-linear strain4isplacement relations for a conventional beam element. The strain energy is formulated in accordance with the slender beam theory and various non-linear terms are identified. The non-linear stiffness matrix is then obtained in two stages. The first step involves application of Castigliano’s theorem to generate the vector of nodal internal forces S from the strain energy of the element. In the second step, we expand S in the nodal co-ordinates q using the Taylor formula. Because of the particular form of S, this expansion is exact and consists of only three terms: linear, quadratic and cubic. It allows us to directly evaluate the respective three terms of the non-linear stiffness matrix by setting: The closed-form expressions for the elemental matrices XG and X,, are provided in terms of the nodal co-ordinates. These were determined using the Maple symbolic computation program, which was also employed to generate the LATEX format of the results and the corresponding Fortran code. The paper is concluded with two numerical examples demonstrating the performance of the dynamics models incorporating the proposed non-linear stiffness term. The first example illustrates the response of a cantilever beam to a prescribed moment at the base. The second example is modelled after an experimental planar manipulator driven by two direct-drive actuators. The results illustrate the differences between three dynamics models formulated with the linear, second-order and third-order approximations for the stiffness term.

[1]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .

[2]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Buckling of Bars, Plates and Shells , 1975 .

[3]  R. A. Rink,et al.  Computer assisted subdivision layout , 1977 .

[4]  R. D. Wood,et al.  GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF BEAMS, FRAMES, ARCHES AND AXISYMMETRIC SHELLS , 1977 .

[5]  K. Bathe,et al.  Large displacement analysis of three‐dimensional beam structures , 1979 .

[6]  T. J. Lardner,et al.  MECHANICS OF SOLIDS WITH APPLICATIONS TO THIN BODIES - WEMPNER,G , 1982 .

[7]  M. Sayir,et al.  A second order theory for large deflections of slender beams , 1983 .

[8]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Joint Rotation and Geometric Nonlinear Analysis , 1986 .

[9]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams Under Large Overall Motions—The Plane Case: Part II , 1986 .

[10]  J. C. Simo,et al.  The role of non-linear theories in transient dynamic analysis of flexible structures , 1987 .

[11]  T. R. Kane,et al.  Dynamics of a cantilever beam attached to a moving base , 1987 .

[12]  Sritawat Kitipornchai,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Angle and Tee Beam‐Columns , 1987 .

[13]  Siu-Lai Chan Geometric and material non‐linear analysis of beam‐columns and frames using the minimum residual displacement method , 1988 .

[14]  John E. Mottershead Geometric stiffness of thin-walled open section beams using a semiloof beam formulation , 1988 .

[15]  E. Dvorkin,et al.  On a non‐linear formulation for curved Timoshenko beam elements considering large displacement/rotation increments , 1988 .

[16]  M. Géradin,et al.  A beam finite element non‐linear theory with finite rotations , 1988 .

[17]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  A Beam Theory for Large Global Rotation, Moderate Local Rotation, and Small Strain , 1988 .

[18]  S. K. Ider,et al.  Nonlinear modeling of flexible multibody systems dynamics subjected to variable constraints , 1989 .

[19]  S. Hanagud,et al.  Problem of the dynamics of a cantilevered beam attached to a moving base , 1989 .

[20]  A variational principle for finite planar deformation of straight slender elastic beams , 1990 .

[21]  G. Venkateswara Rao,et al.  Large-amplitude free vibrations of beams—A discussion on various formulations and assumptions , 1990 .

[22]  An algorithm for the analysis of problems with combined material and geometric nonlinearities , 1990 .

[23]  M. P. Saka,et al.  OPTIMUM DESIGN OF GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR SPACE TRUSSES , 1991 .

[24]  K. Hsiao,et al.  A consistent finite element formulation for non‐linear dynamic analysis of planar beam , 1994 .

[25]  I. Sharf Geometric Stiffening in Multibody Dynamics Formulations , 1995 .

[26]  A SURVEY OF GEOMETRIC STIFFENING IN MULTIBODY DYNAMICS FORMULATIONS , 1995 .

[27]  I. Sharf,et al.  Simulation of Flexible-Link Manipulators With Inertial and Geometric Nonlinearities , 1995 .