Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.

OBJECTIVE Oncotype DX, a 21-gene assay, was clinically validated as a predictor of 10-year recurrence-free survival and treatment response in patients with early-stage estrogen-receptor-positive, lymph-node negative breast cancer (ER+ LN- ESBC). This study determined "real-life" alteration in treatment decision and economic implications of Oncotype DX use in women with ER+ LN- ESBC. METHODS Clalit Health Services (CHS, Tel Aviv, Israel), determined the proportion of women in low, intermediate and high-risk groups in the first 368 Oncotype DX assays performed, the change of adjuvant therapy recommendation following the recurrence (RS) results from Oncotype DX use, and associated chemotherapy costs. The risk of recurrence-free survival was derived from prespecified statistical protocols of NCI-sponsored trials conducted by NSABP (B-14 and B-20). Utilities were literature based. A 3% discount rate was employed. RESULTS Oncotype DX altered recommendations of 40% of patients, 84% of whom were changed from hormone + chemotherapy to hormonal therapy alone. Among high-risk women, 8% switched actual treatment from hormonal therapy to hormone + chemotherapy. By reducing the chemotherapy disutility, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) increased 0.170 years. Use of Oncotype DX costs $10,770 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses revealed that risk reduction in the low-risk population, the cost of adverse events, and the relative risk reduction of recurrence were the most influential variables. CONCLUSION Oncotype DX resulted in net QALY gain and increased overall costs, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $10,770. For CHS, Oncotype DX represents an effective and affordable approach to favorably affect the lives of women with ESBC.

[1]  P. Tartter,et al.  Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer? , 2008, American journal of surgery.

[2]  J. Hornberger,et al.  Impact of a 21‐gene RT‐PCR assay on treatment decisions in early‐stage breast cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[3]  B Fisher,et al.  Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  A. Cohn,et al.  Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of oncology practice.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Impact of gene expression profiling tests on breast cancer outcomes. , 2007, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[7]  R. Feachem Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. , 2002, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[8]  C. Zimmermann,et al.  Framing of outcome and probability of recurrence: Breast cancer patients' choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in hypothetical patient scenarios , 2000, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  Donald L Weaver,et al.  Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975–1999 , 2002, Cancer.

[10]  L. Ries,et al.  Cancer incidence in four member countries (Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, and Jordan) of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC) compared with US SEER. , 2006 .

[11]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[12]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[13]  J. Barendregt,et al.  Global burden of disease , 1997, The Lancet.

[14]  V. Brennan,et al.  PCN77 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF BREAST CANCER UTILITY WEIGHTS , 2008 .

[15]  C. Balch,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed , 2002 .

[16]  S. Klang,et al.  A prospective study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on treatment decisions in N-, ER+ early stage breast cancer patients , 2007 .

[17]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Economic evaluation of 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in Japan , 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[19]  York Springer,et al.  Ajcc Cancer Staging Manual. 7th Ed. New , 2010 .

[20]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowe , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Gary H Lyman,et al.  Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer. , 2005, The American journal of managed care.

[22]  R. Bast,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  W. T. Sawyer,et al.  Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Cronin,et al.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  R. Simes,et al.  Patient preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: how much benefit is needed? , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[26]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  M. Roberts,et al.  Incorporating Quality of Evidence into Decision Analytic Modeling , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.