Patenting and spin-off creation by Canadian researchers in engineering and life sciences

This paper examines the determinants of patenting and spin-off creation using survey data of 479 researchers in engineering and 449 researchers in life sciences funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The results show that research novelty and laboratory size are the only two variables significantly explaining patenting and spin-off formation in both engineering and life sciences. Network capital explains spin-off formation in engineering and in life sciences as well as patenting in life sciences, but not in engineering. Furthermore, the results suggest that many categories of resources explain patenting and spin-off formation in engineering and in life sciences, but that the combinations of resources required differ for patenting and spin-off formation and between engineering and life sciences. The results of this paper suggest that customized policies would be required to accommodate differences between spin-off formation and patenting as well as between engineering and life sciences.

[1]  R. Winkelmann,et al.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COUNT DATA MODELLING: THEORY AND APPLICATION , 1995 .

[2]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Does research organization influence academic production?: Laboratory level evidence from a large European university , 2004 .

[3]  A. Pakes,et al.  Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output? , 2003 .

[4]  Nathan Caplan,et al.  The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization , 1979 .

[5]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter? , 2004 .

[6]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[7]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[8]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education , 2005 .

[9]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[10]  H. Etzkowitz.  Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science , 1983, Minerva.

[11]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[12]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination , 2003 .

[13]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  The technological base of the new enterprise , 1991 .

[14]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Academic entrepreneurs: social learning and participation in university technology transfer , 2006 .

[15]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Exploring the Networking Characteristics of New Venture Founding Teams: A Stdy of Italian Academic Spin-off , 2003 .

[16]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Age, aging, and age structure in science , 1968 .

[17]  Michael A. Stoto,et al.  Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists , 1989 .

[18]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities , 1998 .

[19]  James R. Johnson.  Technology transfer and Universities , 1988 .

[20]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[21]  M. Fontes.  The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs , 2005 .

[22]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[23]  B. Clarysse,et al.  How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective , 2004 .

[24]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[25]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[26]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[27]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex , 1986 .

[28]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  ACADEMIC INCENTIVES, RESEARCH ORGANIZATION AND PATENTING AT A LARGE FRENCH UNIVERSITY , 2007 .

[29]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[30]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[31]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[32]  William Bains,et al.  How academics can make (extra) money out of their science , 2005, Journal of commercial biotechnology.

[33]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[34]  Guido V. Declercq.  A Third Look at the Two Cultures: The New Economic Responsibility of the University. , 1981 .

[35]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Determinants of Faculty Patenting Behavior: Demographics or Opportunities? , 2005 .

[36]  Michele Cincera.  Patents, R&D, and technological spillovers at the firm level: Some evidence from econometric count models for panel data , 1997 .

[37]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[38]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The Emergence of Biotechnology: Institutions and Markets in Industrial Innovation , 1989 .

[39]  A. Sánchez,et al.  The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking , 2003 .

[40]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[41]  Ari-Pekka Hameri,et al.  Technology transfer between basic research and industry , 1996 .

[42]  Janet Bercovitz,et al.  Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Academic Patent and Licensing Behavior: An Exploratory Study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities , 2001 .

[43]  T. Allen,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities , 2005 .

[44]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[45]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[46]  Philippe Mustar,et al.  How French academics create hi-tech companies: The conditions for success or failure , 1997 .

[47]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[48]  B. Looy,et al.  Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? , 2004 .

[49]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT: WHO PARTICIPATES AND WHY? , 2003 .

[50]  Julian Lowe,et al.  Commercialization of university research: A policy perspective , 1993 .

[51]  Ana Paula Faria,et al.  A Count Data Model of Technology Adoption , 2003 .

[52]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Determinants of knowledge transfer: evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering , 2007 .

[53]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[54]  Sarv Devaraj,et al.  An empirical comparison of statistical construct validation approaches , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[55]  Tomas Hellström,et al.  The Strength of Strong Ties: University Spin-offs and the Significance of Historical Relations , 2005 .

[56]  Fabrice Pirnay,et al.  A stage model of academic spin-off creation , 2002 .

[57]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[58]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies , 2001 .

[59]  Scott Shane,et al.  Bringing individuals back in: the effects of career experience on new firm founding , 2003 .

[60]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[61]  H. Etzkowitz.  The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages , 1998 .

[62]  Rebecca De Coster,et al.  Assessment of proposals for new technology ventures in the UK: characteristics of university spin-off companies , 2005 .

[63]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The emergence of biotechnology , 1989 .

[64]  Bradford L. Barham,et al.  UNIVERSITIES AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENT PRODUCTION , 2000 .

[65]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[66]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  The Nature of Technology Transfer , 2002 .

[67]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[68]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[69]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[70]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[71]  Mike Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies , 2003 .

[72]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  The exploitation of complementarities in scientific production process at the laboratory level , 2004 .

[73]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Resource Cooptation Via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures , 1990 .

[74]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[75]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  The role of the research university in the spin-off of high-technology companies , 1986 .