Cumulative minutes with T90 greater than Tempindex is predictive of response of superficial malignancies to hyperthermia and radiation.

PURPOSE To better define thermal parameters related to tumor response in superficial malignancies treated with combined hyperthermia and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients were randomized to receive one or two hyperthermia treatments per week with hyperthermia given during each week of irradiation. Hyperthermia was given for 60 min with treatments begun within 1 hr following irradiation. Power was increased to patient tolerance or normal tissue temperature of 43.0 degrees C. Irradiation was generally given 5 times per week with doses prescribed to normal tissue tolerance (generally 24-70 Gy at 1.8-2.5 Gy per fraction). Multipoint thermometry was used with temperatures obtained every 5 min. RESULTS One hundred eleven individual treatment fields containing 1 or more tumor nodules were completely evaluable. The complete and overall response rates were 46% and 80%, respectively. Forty-one percent of all treatment fields (51% of responding lesions) remained controlled at 2 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the cumulative minutes that the temperature achieved by 90% of the measured tumor sites (T90) was > or = 40.0 degrees C, tumor histology, tumor volume, and radiation dose were significantly associated with complete tumor response. The complete response rate was not significantly affected by the number of hyperthermia treatments given per week. The incidence of clinically significant complications was low. CONCLUSIONS These results support the usefulness of the cumulative minute system in describing time-temperature relationships. The significance of thermal variables with regard to tumor response strongly supports the contention that hyperthermia can be a useful adjunct to irradiation for the local control of cancer.

[1]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[2]  M. Amichetti,et al.  Radical radiation alone versus radical radiation plus microwave hyperthermia for N3 (TNM-UICC) neck nodes: a prospective randomized clinical trial. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  T L Phillips,et al.  RTOG quality assurance guidelines for clinical trials using hyperthermia. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  F. Liu,et al.  Important prognostic factors influencing outcome of combined radiation and hyperthermia. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Hyperthermia quality assurance guidelines. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Clinical experience with a multi-element ultrasonic hyperthermia system: analysis of treatment temperatures. , 1990, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[7]  P. Rubin,et al.  Quality assurance problems in clinical hyperthermia and their impact on therapeutic outcome: a Report by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  G. Lovisolo,et al.  Tumour response to heat and radiation: prognostic variables in the treatment of neck node metastases from head and neck cancer. , 1985, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[9]  J R Oleson,et al.  Tumor temperature distributions predict hyperthermia effect. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[11]  J. Sylvester,et al.  Clinical application of thermal isoeffect dose. , 1987, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[12]  G. Hahn,et al.  Two or six hyperthermia treatments as an adjunct to radiation therapy yield similar tumor responses: results of a randomized trial. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  C. Perez,et al.  Hyperthermia in combination with definitive radiation therapy: results of a Phase I/II RTOG Study. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  J R Oleson,et al.  Analysis of prognostic variables in hyperthermia treatment of 161 patients. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Relationships among tumor temperature, treatment time, and histopathological outcome using preoperative hyperthermia with radiation in soft tissue sarcomas. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  T. Samulski,et al.  Spiral microstrip hyperthermia applicators: technical design and clinical performance. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J. van der Zee,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the response of tumours in patients treated with a combination of radiotherapy and hyperthermia. , 1986, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[18]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  The utility of thermal dose as a predictor of tumor and normal tissue responses to combined radiation and hyperthermia. , 1984, Cancer research.

[19]  Correlation between initial and long-term responses of spontaneous pet animal tumors to heat and radiation or radiation alone. , 1983, Cancer research.