Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis.

We show how the phenomena of genetic dominance, overdominance, additivity, and epistasis are generic features of simple diploid gene regulatory networks. These regulatory network models are together sufficiently complex to catch most of the suggested molecular mechanisms responsible for generating dominant mutations. These include reduced gene dosage, expression or protein activity (haploinsufficiency), increased gene dosage, ectopic or temporarily altered mRNA expression, increased or constitutive protein activity, and dominant negative effects. As classical genetics regards the phenomenon of dominance to be generated by intralocus interactions, we have studied two one-locus models, one with a negative autoregulatory feedback loop, and one with a positive autoregulatory feedback loop. To include the phenomena of epistasis and downstream regulatory effects, a model of a three-locus signal transduction network is also analyzed. It is found that genetic dominance as well as overdominance may be an intra- as well as interlocus interaction phenomenon. In the latter case the dominance phenomenon is intimately connected to either feedback-mediated epistasis or downstream-mediated epistasis. It appears that in the intra- as well as the interlocus case there is considerable room for additive gene action, which may explain to some degree the predictive power of quantitative genetic theory, with its emphasis on this type of gene action. Furthermore, the results illuminate and reconcile the prevailing explanations of heterosis, and they support the old conjecture that the phenomenon of dominance may have an evolutionary explanation related to life history strategy.

[1]  E. Lander,et al.  Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. , 1992, Genetics.

[2]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  Control theory of regulatory cascades. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[4]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Annotation: the analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  C. Davenport DEGENERATION, ALBINISM AND INBREEDING. , 1908, Science.

[6]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  The Possible Modification of the Response of the Wild Type to Recurrent Mutations , 1928, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Epistasis and heterosis , 1988 .

[8]  Jeffrey A. Lefstin,et al.  Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators , 1998, Nature.

[9]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. , 1995, Genetics.

[10]  Lewontin Rc,et al.  Annotation: the analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. , 1974 .

[11]  C. R. Henderson Prediction of Merits of Potential Matings from Sire-Maternal Grandsire Models with Nonadditive Genetic Effects , 1989 .

[12]  M A Savageau,et al.  Concepts relating the behavior of biochemical systems to their underlying molecular properties. , 1971, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[13]  P. Keightley A metabolic basis for dominance and recessivity. , 1996, Genetics.

[14]  Mapping factors controlling genetic expression. , 1994, Cellular and molecular biology.

[15]  Cai-guo Xu,et al.  Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. , 1995, Genetics.

[17]  H V Westerhoff,et al.  Internal regulation of a modular system: the different faces of internal control. , 1997, Bio Systems.

[18]  D. Bray Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells , 1995, Nature.

[19]  A. Long,et al.  High resolution mapping of genetic factors affecting abdominal bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1995, Genetics.

[20]  I. Hoeschele,et al.  Additive and nonadditive genetic variance in female fertility of Holsteins. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  Michael J. Kearsey,et al.  Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 2020 .

[22]  L. Glass Classification of biological networks by their qualitative dynamics. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  M. Turelli PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION, CONSTANT COVARIANCES, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF ADDITIVE VARIANCE , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  B. Charlesworth Evidence against Fisher's theory of dominance , 1979, Nature.

[25]  R. Fisher Professor Wright on the Theory of Dominance , 1934, The American Naturalist.

[26]  D. Bourguet The evolution of dominance , 1999, Heredity.

[27]  A. Wilkie,et al.  The molecular basis of genetic dominance. , 1994, Journal of medical genetics.

[28]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[29]  S. B. Barrett A Popular History of Astronomy during the Nineteenth Century , 1908 .

[30]  A Sorribas,et al.  A comparison of variant theories of intact biochemical systems. II. Flux-oriented and metabolic control theories. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[31]  Philippe Soriano,et al.  Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. , 1991, Genes & development.

[32]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[33]  J. Prioul,et al.  Dissecting complex physiological functions through the use of molecular quantitative genetics , 1997 .

[34]  H. A. Orr,et al.  A test of Fisher's theory of dominance. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  R. Fisher The Evolution of Dominance; Reply to Professor Sewall Wright , 1929, The American Naturalist.

[36]  J. W. Porteous Dominance--one hundred and fifteen years after Mendel's paper. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  V. Chandler,et al.  Epigenetic allelic states of a maize transcriptional regulatory locus exhibit overdominant gene action. , 1998, Genetics.

[38]  D. Roff,et al.  Dominance variance: associations with selection and fitness , 1995, Heredity.

[39]  C. Damerval,et al.  Quantification of dominance for proteins pleiotropically affected by opaque-2 in maize , 1993, Heredity.

[40]  J. Felsenstein,et al.  The effect of linkage on directional selection. , 1965, Genetics.

[41]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Fisher's Theory of Dominance , 1929, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Protein modules and signalling networks , 1995, Nature.

[43]  M A Savageau,et al.  The tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. IV. Resolution of discrepancies between alternative methods of analysis. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[44]  L. Glass Combinatorial and topological methods in nonlinear chemical kinetics , 1975 .

[45]  J. Josse,et al.  Quantitative trait loci underlying gene product variation: a novel perspective for analyzing regulation of genome expression. , 1994, Genetics.

[46]  G. Shull The composition of a field of maize , 1908 .

[47]  J. Doebley,et al.  teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. , 1995, Genetics.

[48]  M A Savageau,et al.  Dominance according to metabolic control analysis: major achievement or house of cards? , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  Jody Hey,et al.  The limits of selection during maize domestication , 1999, Nature.

[50]  P. Phillips The language of gene interaction. , 1998, Genetics.

[51]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Two Further Notes on the Origin of Dominance , 1928, The American Naturalist.

[52]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[53]  T. Mestl,et al.  A mathematical framework for describing and analysing gene regulatory networks. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  Thomas Mestl,et al.  A methodological basis for description and analysis of systems with complex switch-like interactions , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[55]  J Li,et al.  Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. , 1995, Genetics.

[56]  S. Wright The Evolution of Dominance , 1929, The American Naturalist.

[57]  El Houssine Snoussi,et al.  Logical identification of all steady states: The concept of feedback loop characteristic states , 1993 .

[58]  R. Bürger,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF DOMINANCE: A THEORY WHOSE TIME HAS PASSED? , 1997 .

[59]  R. Fisher THE EVOLUTION OF DOMINANCE , 1931 .

[60]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Physiological and Evolutionary Theories of Dominance , 1934, The American Naturalist.

[61]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas , 1999, Heredity.

[62]  H. Kacser,et al.  The molecular basis of dominance. , 1981, Genetics.