Seismic and Energetic Interventions on a Typical South Italy Residential Building: Cost Analysis and Tax Detraction

Italian buildings are mainly represented by unreinforced masonry constructions, which were mostly built before 1970, often without respecting seismic design criteria. The main objective of Italian designers is, therefore, to retrofit these buildings in order to improve their safety under earthquake, as well as to preserve the memory of the ancient building art. In addition, the assessment of the building energetic efficiency is nowadays a very pressing need for designers and practitioners. Energetic efficiency represents the capacity to optimize the consumption of energy resources in order to reach prefixed requirements for the environment protection. This paper shows both seismic and energetic retrofitting interventions on a residential unreinforced masonry building typical of the constructive practice in the South Italy. Initially, the building characterization under geometrical and structural viewpoints is done. Subsequently, the seismic vulnerability verification is performed with unsatisfactory results, so requiring upgrading or retrofitting interventions. Moreover, with the aim to increase living comfort and energy efficiency, energetic upgrading interventions, aimed at decreasing the building transmittance, are proposed. Seismic and energetic interventions are then computed from the economic point of view in order to evaluate the financial contributions foreseen by the Italian 2018 Balance Law through the Sismabonus and Ecobonus tools, respectively. Finally, the study proposes a global performance index able to take into account contemporary the seismic, energetic and economic benefits deriving from retrofitting interventions applied on the inspected residential building.

[1]  Qing-Shan Jia,et al.  Performance Analysis and Comparison on Energy Storage Devices for Smart Building Energy Management , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  K. Ueno,et al.  Expert Meeting Report: Interior Insulation Retrofit of Mass Masonry Wall Assemblies , 2012 .

[3]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Uses and limits of the Equivalent Frame Model on existing unreinforced masonry buildings for assessing their seismic risk: A review , 2017 .

[4]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  Predictive model for the seismic vulnerability assessment of small historic centres: Application to the inner Abruzzi Region in Italy , 2017 .

[5]  Donghwan Lee,et al.  Optimization of Energy Consumption Using BIM-Based Building Energy Performance Analysis , 2013 .

[6]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Numerical model upgrading of ancient bell towers monitored with a wired sensors network , 2018 .

[7]  G. Milani,et al.  FRP-Strengthening of Curved Masonry Structures: Local Bond Behavior and Global Response , 2017 .

[8]  Antonella Violano,et al.  Energy and Seismic Recovering of Ancient Hamlets: the Case of Baia e Latina , 2018, Sustainability.

[9]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Ambient vibration tests on three religious buildings in Goriano Sicoli damged during the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2010 .

[10]  Antonio Formisano,et al.  Theoretical and Numerical Seismic Analysis of Masonry Building Aggregates: Case Studies in San Pio Delle Camere (L’Aquila, Italy) , 2017 .

[11]  Gabriele Comanducci,et al.  Environmental effects on natural frequencies of the San Pietro bell tower in Perugia, Italy, and their removal for structural performance assessment , 2017 .

[12]  Gabriele Comanducci,et al.  Assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower after 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence by long-term SHM , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[13]  N. D’Agostino,et al.  Contemporary crustal extension in the Umbria–Marche Apennines from regional CGPS networks and comparison between geodetic and seismic deformation , 2009 .

[14]  Edoardo Cosenza,et al.  The Italian guidelines for seismic risk classification of constructions: technical principles and validation , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[15]  Gianfranco De Matteis,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of historic centers: description of a predictive method and application to the case study of scanno (Abruzzi, Italy) , 2018, International Journal of Architectural Heritage.

[16]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Numerical model upgrading of a historical masonry building damaged during the 2016 Italian earthquakes: the case study of the Podestà palace in Montelupone (Italy) , 2017 .

[17]  Antonio Formisano,et al.  Consolidation Methods of Romanian Historical Building with Composite Materials , 2017 .

[18]  M. Cattaneo,et al.  The Amatrice 2016 seismic sequence: a preliminary look at the mainshock and aftershocks distribution , 2016 .

[19]  Andrea Prota,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Masonry Strengthened with Composites , 2018, Polymers.

[20]  Niccolò Aste,et al.  ENERGY RETROFIT OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS: AN ITALIAN CASE STUDY , 2012 .

[21]  Antonio Formisano,et al.  Simplified and refined methods for seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of an Italian cultural heritage masonry building , 2017 .

[22]  M. Indirli,et al.  Comparison between in situ experimental data and Italian code standard values , 2016 .