Pricing of partially compatible products

In this paper, we examine a duopolistic market where the two firms compete to sell a system of components. Components are digital (firms haveunlimited supply at no marginal cost), and customers are homogeneous in their component preferences. Each customer will assemble a utility maximizing system by purchasing each necessary component from one of the two firms. While components from the same firm are always compatible, pairwise compatibility of components from rival firms may vary; in addition to utility due to the quality of the system purchased, customers have negative utility for purchasing incompatible parts. We investigate algorithms and hardness results for profit-maximizing decisions of the firms with regards to their price-setting, component value-enhancing and compatibility-enabling strategies. The users' behavior can be modeled as a minimum cut computation, and the company's strategies require addressing novel and interesting questions about graph cuts and flows. We develop a polynomial-time algorithm for finding profit-maximizing prices if the qualities and compatibilities are fixed. On the other hand, we show that finding profit-maximizing quality improvements is equivalent to the Maximum Size Bounded Capacity Cut problem, and thus NP-complete. Finally, for the problem of improving compatibilities to maximize the price, we give polynomial approximation hardness results even in very restricted cases, but show that if all components have uniform prices, and quality differences are small, then an approximation can be found in polynomial time.

[1]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Competitive generalized auctions , 2002, STOC '02.

[2]  J. Håstad Clique is hard to approximate withinn1−ε , 1999 .

[3]  Piotr Krysta,et al.  Single-minded unlimited supply pricing on sparse instances , 2006, SODA '06.

[4]  Matthew Woll,et al.  Standardization , 1928 .

[5]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing , 2005, SODA '05.

[6]  Kunal Talwar,et al.  The Price of Truth: Frugality in Truthful Mechanisms , 2003, STACS.

[7]  Johan Håstad,et al.  Clique is hard to approximate within n/sup 1-/spl epsiv// , 1996, Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science.

[8]  Jianzhong Zhang,et al.  Inverse problem of minimum cuts , 1998, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[9]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Min-Max Multiway Cut , 2004, APPROX-RANDOM.

[10]  Pierre Regibeau,et al.  Compatibility and Bundling of Complementary Goods in a Duopoly , 1992 .

[11]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Competitive auctions and digital goods , 2001, SODA '01.

[12]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  First-price path auctions , 2005, EC '05.

[13]  Arild Stubhaug Acta Mathematica , 1886, Nature.

[14]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Inverse Optimization, Part I: Linear Programming and General Problem , 1998 .

[15]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[16]  Anna R. Karlin,et al.  Beyond VCG: frugality of truthful mechanisms , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[17]  R. Lathe Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[18]  TardosÉva,et al.  Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships , 2002 .

[19]  Joseph Naor,et al.  Approximation algorithms for the metric labeling problem via a new linear programming formulation , 2001, SODA '01.

[20]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  Algorithms for Multi-product Pricing , 2004, ICALP.

[21]  David Kempe,et al.  Unbalanced Graph Cuts , 2005, ESA.

[22]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[23]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Inverse Optimization , 2001, Oper. Res..

[24]  Robert Krauthgamer,et al.  A polylogarithmic approximation of the minimum bisection , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[25]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Desirability of Compatibility in the Absence of Network Externalities , 1989 .

[26]  P. Klemperer Auction Theory: A Guide to the Literature , 1999 .

[27]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Approximation algorithms for classification problems with pairwise relationships: metric labeling and Markov random fields , 1999, 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039).

[28]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .