Effects of Cochlear Hearing Loss on the Benefits of Ideal Binary Masking

Ideal Binary Masking (IdBM) is considered as the primary goal of computational auditory scene analysis. This binary masking criterion provides a time-frequency representation of noisy speech and retains regions where the speech dominates the noise while discarding regions where the noise is dominant. Several studies have shown the benefits of IdBM for normal hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as well as cochlear implant recipients. In this study, we evaluate the effects of simulated moderate and severe hearing loss on the masking release resulting from IdBM. Speech-shaped noise was added to IEEE sentences; the stimuli were processed using a tone-vocoder with 32 bandpass filters. The bandwidths of the filters were adjusted to account for impaired frequency selectivity observed in individuals with moderate and severe hearing loss. Following envelope extraction, the IdBM processing was then applied to the envelopes. The processed stimuli were presented to nineteen normal hearing listeners and their intelligibility scores were measured. Statistical analysis indicated that participants' benefit from IdBM was significantly reduced with impaired frequency selectivity (spectral smearing). Results show that the masking release obtained from IdBM is highly dependent on the listeners’ hearing loss.

[1]  K. Wagener,et al.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Oldooz Hazrati,et al.  Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure:Effects of Age and Hearing Loss , 2014 .

[4]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Requirements for the evaluation of computational speech segregation systems. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Yi Hu,et al.  Environment-specific noise suppression for improved speech intelligibility by cochlear implant users. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Yi Hu,et al.  A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Effect of Speech Material on the Benefit of Temporal Fine Structure Information in Speech for Young Normal-Hearing and Older Hearing-Impaired Participants , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Yang Lu,et al.  An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B. Moore,et al.  The contribution of temporal fine structure information to the intelligibility of speech in noise , 2008 .

[11]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Monaural speech segregation based on pitch tracking and amplitude modulation , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[12]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  On Ideal Binary Mask As the Computational Goal of Auditory Scene Analysis , 2005, Speech Separation by Humans and Machines.

[13]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the identification of speech in noise filtered into low- and mid-frequency regions. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The importance of temporal fine structure information in speech at different spectral regions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Jim Euchner Design , 2014, Catalysis from A to Z.

[18]  P. Loizou,et al.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Oldooz Hazrati,et al.  Comparison of two channel selection criteria for noise suppression in cochlear implants. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Philipos C Loizou,et al.  Effect of spectral resolution on the intelligibility of ideal binary masked speech. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[23]  Guy J. Brown,et al.  Computational auditory scene analysis , 1994, Comput. Speech Lang..