A Recommendation on How to Analyze In-Room PET for In Vivo Proton Range Verification Using a Distal PET Surface Method

We describe the rationale and implementation of a method for analyzing in-room positron emission tomography (PET) data to verify the proton beam range. The method is based on analyzing distal PET surfaces after passive scattering proton beam delivery. Typically in vivo range verification is done by comparing measured and predicted PET distribution for a single activity level at a selected activity line along the beam passage. In the method presented here, we suggest using a middle point method based on dual PET activity levels to minimize the uncertainty due to local variations in the PET activity. Furthermore, we introduce 2-dimensional (2D) PET activity level surfaces based on 3-dimensional maps of the PET activities along the beam passage. This allows determining not only average range differences but also range difference distributions as well as root mean square deviations (RMSDs) for a more comprehensive range analysis. The method is demonstrated using data from 8 patients who were scanned with an in-room PET scanner. For each of the 8 patients, the average range difference was less than 5 mm and the RMSD was 4 to 11 mm between the measured and simulated PET activity level surfaces for single-field treatments. An ongoing protocol at our institution allows the use of a single field for patients being imaged for the PET range verification study at 1 fraction during their treatment course. Visualizing the range difference distributions using the PET surfaces offers a convenient visual verification of range uncertainties in 2D. Using the distal activity level surfaces of simulated and measured PET distributions at the middle of 25% and 50% activity level is a robust method for in vivo range verification.

[1]  J. Archambeau,et al.  Visualization and Transport of Positron Emission from Proton Activation in vivo , 1978, Science.

[2]  Proton therapy in combination with PET as monitor: a feasibility study , 1992 .

[3]  British Columbia. Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite , 1996 .

[4]  D W Litzenberg,et al.  On-line monitoring of radiotherapy beams: experimental results with proton beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[5]  K Parodi,et al.  Dose quantification from in-beam positron emission tomography. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Charged hadron tumour therapy monitoring by means of PET , 2004 .

[7]  Koji Murakami,et al.  Distributions of beta+ decayed nuclei generated in the CH2 and H2O targets by the target nuclear fragment reaction using therapeutic MONO and SOBP proton beam. , 2005, Medical physics.

[8]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  On the detector arrangement for in-beam PET for hadron therapy monitoring , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  H Paganetti,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the physical potential of proton beam range verification with PET/CT , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J S Karp,et al.  Design study of an in situ PET scanner for use in proton beam therapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Jinsong Ouyang,et al.  Monitoring proton radiation therapy with in-room PET imaging , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Implementation and workflow for PET monitoring of therapeutic ion irradiation: a comparison of in-beam, in-room, and off-line techniques , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  H. Paganetti Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Clinical application of in-room positron emission tomography for in vivo treatment monitoring in proton radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  O. Mawlawi,et al.  Determination of elemental tissue composition following proton treatment using positron emission tomography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.