End-to-end Bayesian analysis for summarizing sets of radiocarbon dates

Abstract Archaeologists and demographers increasingly employ aggregations of published radiocarbon (14C) dates as demographic proxies summarizing changes in human activity in past societies. Presently, summed probability densities (SPDs) of calibrated radiocarbon dates are the dominant method of using 14C dates to reconstruct demographic trends. Unfortunately, SPDs are incapable of converging on the distribution that generated a set of radiocarbon measurements, even when the number of observations is large. To overcome this problem, we propose a more principled alternative that combines finite mixture models and end-to-end Bayesian inference. Numerical simulations and an assessment of the statistical identifiability of our method demonstrate that it correctly converges on the generating distribution for two important models, exponentials and finite Gaussian mixtures, at least if the same statistical model is used to fit the data as was used to generate the data. To further validate this approach, we apply it to a set of radiocarbon dates from the Maya city of Tikal. We show that an end-to-end approach reconstructs with high accuracy expert demographic reconstructions based on settlement patterns and ceramics, but with more precise time-resolution and characterization of uncertainty than has heretofore been possible. Future work should consider alternatives to finite Gaussian mixtures for fitting the generating distribution.

[1]  N. Dunning,et al.  Prehispanic Agrosystems and Adaptive Regions in the Maya Lowlands , 1998 .

[2]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[3]  James Holland Jones,et al.  The Force of Selection on the Human Life Cycle. , 2009, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[4]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[5]  John Meadows,et al.  Summed radiocarbon calibrations as a population proxy: a critical evaluation using a realistic simulation approach , 2014 .

[6]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[7]  S. Shennan,et al.  Reconstructing regional population fluctuations in the European Neolithic using radiocarbon dates: a new case-study using an improved method , 2014, Journal of Archaeological Science.

[8]  P. Hiscock,et al.  Dates and demography? The need for caution in using radiometric dates as a robust proxy for prehistoric population change , 2016 .

[9]  S. Shennan,et al.  Comparing archaeological proxies for long-term population patterns: An example from central Italy , 2017 .

[10]  P. Persson,et al.  De-Neolithisation in southern Norway inferred from statistical modelling of radiocarbon dates , 2019, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology.

[11]  Elizabeth A. Hadly,et al.  Post-invasion demography of prehistoric humans in South America , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Mike Smith The use of summed-probability plots of radiocarbon data in archaeology , 2016 .

[13]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[14]  R. Lee Lyman,et al.  The Concept of Equifinality in Taphonomy , 2004 .

[15]  K. Gajewski,et al.  Radiocarbon dates as estimates of ancient human population size , 2016 .

[16]  Sean Ulm,et al.  Radiometric dates are a robust proxy for long-term demographic change: a comment on Attenbrow and Hiscock (2015) , 2016 .

[17]  J. Rick Dates as Data: An Examination of the Peruvian Preceramic Radiocarbon Record , 1987, American Antiquity.

[18]  Tim Kerig,et al.  Regional population collapse followed initial agriculture booms in mid-Holocene Europe , 2013, Nature Communications.

[19]  Mark George Thomas,et al.  Directly modelling population dynamics in the South American Arid Diagonal using 14C dates , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[20]  G. Haug,et al.  Correlating the Ancient Maya and Modern European Calendars with High-Precision AMS 14C Dating , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[21]  W. Carleton,et al.  Sum things are not what they seem: Problems with point-wise interpretations and quantitative analyses of proxies based on aggregated radiocarbon dates , 2020, The Holocene.

[22]  Julien Hiquet Webster David, The population of Tikal. Implications for Maya demography , 2019, Journal de la société des américanistes.

[23]  H. Teicher Identifiability of Finite Mixtures , 1963 .

[24]  C. White,et al.  Human biology in the Classic Maya collapse: Evidence from paleopathology and paleodiet , 1996 .

[25]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Measuring selective constraint on fertility in human life histories , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Peter Hiscock,et al.  Dates and demography: are radiometric dates a robust proxy for long‐term prehistoric demographic change? , 2015 .

[27]  R. DiNapoli,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Computation of radiocarbon and paleoenvironmental record shows population resilience on Rapa Nui (Easter Island) , 2021, Nature Communications.

[28]  A. F. M. Smith,et al.  Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: a Bayesian approach to calibration , 1991, Antiquity.

[29]  T. Rothenberg Identification in Parametric Models , 1971 .

[30]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  On global identifiability for arbitrary model parametrizations , 1994, Autom..

[31]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[32]  M. Madella,et al.  Summed Probability Distribution of 14C Dates Suggests Regional Divergences in the Population Dynamics of the Jomon Period in Eastern Japan , 2016, PloS one.

[33]  A. Bevan,et al.  INFERENCE FROM LARGE SETS OF RADIOCARBON DATES: SOFTWARE AND METHODS , 2020, Radiocarbon.

[34]  S. Shennan,et al.  Spatio-temporal approaches to archaeological radiocarbon dates , 2017 .

[35]  W. F. Libby,et al.  UCLA Radiocarbon Dates VI , 1967, Radiocarbon: An International Journal of Cosmogenic Isotope Research.

[36]  E. Scott,et al.  The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP) , 2020, Radiocarbon.

[37]  R. Berger,et al.  Lowland Maya radiocarbon dates and the classic Maya collapse , 1979, Nature.

[38]  A. Rogers On Equifinality in Faunal Analysis , 2000, American Antiquity.

[39]  L. E. Wright Immigration to Tikal, Guatemala: Evidence from stable strontium and oxygen isotopes , 2012 .

[40]  W. Carleton Evaluating Bayesian Radiocarbon‐dated Event Count (REC) models for the study of long‐term human and environmental processes , 2020, Journal of Quaternary Science.

[41]  Christopher Bronk Ramsey,et al.  Methods for Summarizing Radiocarbon Datasets , 2017, Radiocarbon.

[42]  J. Haslett,et al.  A simple monotone process with application to radiocarbon‐dated depth chronologies , 2008 .