Features enhance the encoding of geometry

Successful navigation within an environment requires that the traveler establish the correct heading—a process referred to as orienting. Many studies have now shown that humans and non-human animals can use the geometric properties of an enclosure to orient. In the present study, two groups of Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) were trained, in a reference memory task, to find food hidden in one of four containers arranged to form a rectangular array. One group had unique objects placed next to each of the containers, whereas the second group had identical objects placed next to each of the containers. Here, I show for the first time that for the Clark’s nutcracker, the distinctive properties of these objects enhanced the encoding of the array’s geometry compared to the learning of geometric properties from an array of identical objects, which remained at chance after substantial amounts of training. Subsequent transformation tests showed that an object not associated with reward, but sharing the same geometric properties as the correct object, may have had inhibitory qualities. Furthermore, by systematically removing objects from the array, I show that although nutcrackers encoded the geometry of the array, they did not encode a complete featural representation of the objects within the array.

[1]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2000 .

[2]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[3]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[5]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Children's use of geometry for reorientation. , 2008, Developmental science.

[7]  M L Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  The seed-storing corvid Clark's nutcracker learns geometric relationships among landmarks , 1997, Nature.

[9]  T. Ritz,et al.  The magnetic compass of domestic chickens, Gallus gallus , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  M. Davison,et al.  Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon , 2004, Nature.

[11]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[12]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  C J Whitaker,et al.  Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[14]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[15]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: I. Do adults encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[16]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[17]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Encoding of relative enclosure size in a dynamic three-dimensional virtual environment by humans , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[18]  S. Gouteux,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and non geometric during a reorientation task , 2001 .

[19]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[20]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Hemispheric processing of landmark and geometric information in male and female domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  Sharon R. Doerkson,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans : II . Generality Across Search Tasks , 2001 .

[22]  K. Cheng The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. , 1989 .

[23]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Use of Landmarks in Three Species of Food-storing Corvids , 2010 .

[26]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[27]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Landmark use by Clark’s nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana): influence of disorientation and cue rotation on distance and direction estimates , 2009, Animal Cognition.

[28]  K. A. Jellinger Comparative Cognition: Experimental Exploration of Animal Intelligence , 2007 .

[29]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: II. Do pigeons (Columba livia) encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[30]  Christian F. Doeller,et al.  Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  A C Kamil,et al.  Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  D. M. Kelly,et al.  Use of a geometric rule or absolute vectors: Landmark use by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[33]  R. Hen,et al.  Anxiolytic-like actions of toluene in the burying behavior and plus-maze tests: differences in sensitivity between 5-HT1B knockout and wild-type mice , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  A. Della Chiesa,et al.  Spatial cognition based on geometry and landmarks in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[36]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). , 2002 .

[38]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[39]  Anthony McGregor,et al.  Absence of an interaction between navigational strategies based on local and distal landmarks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[40]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[41]  B. Gibson,et al.  Use of landmark features and geometry by children and adults during a two-dimensional search task , 2007 .

[42]  A. Della Chiesa,et al.  Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[43]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  How fish do geometry in large and in small spaces , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[44]  Noam Miller,et al.  Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[45]  J. Pearce,et al.  Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[46]  J. Pearce,et al.  Transfer of Spatial Behaviour Controlled by a Landmark Array with a Distinctive Shape , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[47]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  What do rats learn about the geometry of object arrays? Tests with exploratory behavior. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[48]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Strategies in landmark use by children, adults, and marmoset monkeys , 2004 .

[49]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[50]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[51]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[52]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the Avian Brain. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[53]  W. Wiltschko,et al.  Homing pigeons (Columba livia f. domestica) can use magnetic cues for locating food , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[54]  Brett M Gibson,et al.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) encode the shape of an array of discrete objects. , 2007, Journal of comparative psychology.

[55]  K. Cheng,et al.  The determination of direction in landmark-based spatial search in pigeons: A further test of the vector sum model , 1994 .

[56]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .