Learner-Centered Inquiry in Undergraduate Biology: Positive Relationships with Long-Term Student Achievement

We determined short- and long-term correlates of a revised introductory biology curriculum on understanding of biology as a process of inquiry and learning of content. In the original curriculum students completed two traditional lecture-based introductory courses. In the revised curriculum students completed two new learner-centered, inquiry-based courses. The new courses differed significantly from those of the original curriculum through emphases on critical thinking, collaborative work, and/or inquiry-based activities. Assessments were administered to compare student understanding of the process of biological science and content knowledge in the two curricula. More seniors who completed the revised curriculum had high-level profiles on the Views About Science Survey for Biology compared with seniors who completed the original curriculum. Also as seniors, students who completed the revised curriculum scored higher on the standardized Biology Field Test. Our results showed that an intense inquiry-based learner-centered learning experience early in the biology curriculum was associated with long-term improvements in learning. We propose that students learned to learn science in the new courses which, in turn, influenced their learning in subsequent courses. Studies that determine causal effects of learner-centered inquiry-based approaches, rather than correlative relationships, are needed to test our proposed explanation.

[1]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[2]  Renato Schibeci,et al.  Influence of students' background and perceptions on science attitudes and achievement , 1986 .

[3]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics , 2007 .

[4]  Robert S. Leiken,et al.  A User’s Guide , 2011 .

[5]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[6]  R. Dehaan,et al.  The Impending Revolution in Undergraduate Science Education , 2005 .

[7]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Disciplinary Research Strategies for Assessment of Learning , 2003 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[9]  C. Fosnot Constructivism : theory, perspectives, and practice , 1996 .

[10]  J. Michael Where's the evidence that active learning works? , 2006, Advances in physiology education.

[11]  Jim Gentile,et al.  Teaching in a Research Context , 2003, Science.

[12]  Roger Säljö,et al.  Learning and understanding , 1982 .

[13]  Marye Anne Fox,et al.  Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching : in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics , 2003 .

[14]  Scott Freeman,et al.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[15]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: lessons learned from building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[17]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Views About Science and physics achievement: The VASS story , 2008 .

[18]  J. Postlethwait,et al.  Workshop Biology: Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Active Learning in an Introductory Biology Course , 2002 .

[19]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  Learning and Understanding: Improving Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in U.S. High Schools, NRC Report , 2002 .

[20]  William B Wood,et al.  Teaching more by lecturing less. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[21]  Kathy Garvin-Doxas,et al.  Recognizing Student Misconceptions through Ed's Tools and the Biology Concept Inventory , 2008, PLoS biology.

[22]  M. Linn,et al.  How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? , 1991 .

[23]  Dale R. Baker,et al.  Process skills acquisition, cognitive growth, and attitude change of ninth grade students in a scientific literacy course , 1991 .

[24]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[25]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Pathways to Scientific Teaching , 2008 .

[26]  John D. Bransford,et al.  How Students Learn: Science in the Classroom. , 2005 .

[27]  David Hestenes,et al.  Interpreting VASS Dimensions and Profiles for Physics Students , 1998 .

[28]  C. Hansel Scientific Teaching , 1972, Nature.

[29]  Jill H. Larkin,et al.  Cognition in Scientific and Everyday Domains: Comparison and Learning Implications. , 1991 .

[30]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[31]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[32]  J. Batzli,et al.  Aligning goals, assessments, and activities: an approach to teaching PCR and gel electrophoresis. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.