A Comparative Study of Continuum and Structural Modelling Approaches to Simulate Bone Adaptation in the Pelvic Construct

This study presents the development of a number of finite element (FE) models of the pelvis using different continuum and structural modelling approaches. Four FE models were developed using different modelling approaches: continuum isotropic, continuum orthotropic, hybrid isotropic and hybrid orthotropic. The models were subjected to an iterative adaptation process based on the Mechanostat principle. Each model was adapted to a number of common daily living activities (walking, stair ascent, stair descent, sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit) by applying onto it joint and muscle loads derived using a musculoskeletal modelling framework. The resulting models, along with a structural model previously developed by the authors, were compared visually in terms of bone architecture, and their response to a single load case was compared to a continuum FE model derived from CT imaging data. The main findings of this study were that the continuum orthotropic model was the closest to the CT derived model in terms of load response albeit having less total bone volume, suggesting that the role of material directionality in influencing the maximum orthotropic Young’s modulus should be included in continuum bone adaptation models. In addition, the hybrid models, where trabecular and cortical bone were distinguished, had similar outcomes, suggesting that the approach to modelling trabecular bone is less influential when the cortex is modelled separately.

[1]  A. Bull,et al.  An open source lower limb model: Hip joint validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  Andrew T. M. Phillips,et al.  Structural optimisation: biomechanics of the femur , 2011, 1110.1286.

[4]  Luca Modenese,et al.  Femoral bone mesoscale structural architecture prediction using musculoskeletal and finite element modelling , 2015 .

[5]  Andrew T. M. Phillips,et al.  Informing phenomenological structural bone remodelling with a mechanistic poroelastic model , 2015, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[6]  H F J M Koopman,et al.  Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  Damien Lacroix,et al.  In silico bone mechanobiology: modeling a multifaceted biological system , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[8]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  C. Josten,et al.  Description of the iliolumbar ligament for computer-assisted reconstruction. , 2010, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[10]  Matthew S. DeMers,et al.  Compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[11]  Luca Modenese,et al.  Hip Abduction Can Prevent Posterior Edge Loading of Hip Replacements , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  Zuoping Li,et al.  Biomechanical response of the pubic symphysis in lateral pelvic impacts: a finite element study. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  L Modenese,et al.  Application of a falsification strategy to a musculoskeletal model of the lower limb and accuracy of the predicted hip contact force vector. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  N L Svensson,et al.  Stresses in the normal pelvis. , 1978, Computers in biology and medicine.

[15]  A. Phillips,et al.  Pelvic Construct Prediction of Trabecular and Cortical Bone Structural Architecture. , 2018, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  S B Murphy,et al.  Comparison of predicted and measured contact pressures in normal and dysplastic hips. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress distributions in the acetabular region--I. Before and after total joint replacement. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Arnaud Barré,et al.  Biomechanical ToolKit: Open-source framework to visualize and process biomechanical data , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[19]  Diogo M. Geraldes,et al.  Consideration of multiple load cases is critical in modelling orthotropic bone adaptation in the femur , 2015, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[20]  A J van den Bogert,et al.  An analysis of hip joint loading during walking, running, and skiing. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  Hwj Rik Huiskes,et al.  Finite element analysis of acetabular reconstruction. Noncemented threaded cups. , 1987, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  Tomonori Yamada,et al.  Computer simulation of trabecular remodeling in human proximal femur using large-scale voxel FE models: Approach to understanding Wolff's law. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Hamid Nayeb-Hashemi,et al.  Numerical simulation of load-induced bone structural remodelling using stress-limit criterion , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  A. Phillips,et al.  Microscale poroelastic metamodel for efficient mesoscale bone remodelling simulations , 2017, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[25]  L. Chèze,et al.  Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. body segment inertial parameters. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[27]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Development and validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the pelvic bone. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  M Honl,et al.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  C. Dietschi,et al.  Mechanical function of subchondral bone as experimentally determined on the acetabulum of the human pelvis. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  H. Frost Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. , 2003, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[33]  W C Van Buskirk,et al.  A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  T. Keller Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  A. Phillips,et al.  Finite element modelling of the pelvis: inclusion of muscular and ligamentous boundary conditions. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  J J O'Connor,et al.  Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  H Oonishi,et al.  Mechanical analysis of the human pelvis and its application to the artificial hip joint--by means of the three dimensional finite element method. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  K. L. Moore,et al.  Essential Clinical Anatomy , 1995 .

[39]  J H Keyak,et al.  Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[40]  Swee Hin Teoh,et al.  Relationship between CT intensity, micro-architecture and mechanical properties of porcine vertebral cancellous bone. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[41]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[42]  C. Josten,et al.  The sacrotuberous and the sacrospinous ligament--a virtual reconstruction. , 2009, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[43]  D. J. Rapperport,et al.  Contact finite element stress analysis of the hip joint , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[44]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress distributions in the acetabular region--II. Effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the total hip acetabular component. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  R Huiskes,et al.  Total hip reconstruction in acetabular dysplasia. A finite element study. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[46]  Andrew T. M. Phillips,et al.  A Novel 3D Strain-Adaptive Continuum Orthotropic Bone Remodelling Algorithm: Prediction of Bone Architecture in the Femur , 2010 .

[47]  J. Tong,et al.  A subject-specific pelvic bone model and its application to cemented acetabular replacements. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  Liping Wang,et al.  Computational Modeling of Bone Cells and Their Biomechanical Behaviors in Responses to Mechanical Stimuli. , 2019, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[49]  D R Pedersen,et al.  An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  Diogo M. Geraldes,et al.  A comparative study of orthotropic and isotropic bone adaptation in the femur , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.