Comparison of clustering techniques of multiple partial discharge sources in high voltage transformer windings

Modern high voltage (HV) insulation systems consist of multiple dielectric media - multi-source partial discharge (PD) data discrimination is required. The ability to accurately distinguish between the PD signals generated from different sources is seen as a critical function of future diagnostic systems. Two model PD sources were utilized in this investigation to replicate void and surface discharges. The proposed processing technique relies on the assumption that the PD pulses generated from different sources exhibit unique waveform characteristics. Several clustering techniques have been employed to identify and separate multiple PD sources recently. However, for further analysis, the techniques used must produce a significant separation between the clustered data as the phase resolved patterns produced by multiple PD sources overlap - inhibiting automated classification. An experiment has been designed to activate a pair of PD sources and inject the signals simultaneously into an HV transformer winding. After the PD pulses were extracted from the measurement data recorded using two wideband radio frequency current transformers (RFCTs) positioned at the neutral to earth point and the bushing tappoint to earth. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and t- Distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) were applied to the Wavelet Energy (WE) data and their performance at discriminating between the two PD sources assessed.

[1]  A. Kyprianou,et al.  Evaluation of Partial Discharge Denoising using the Wavelet Packets Transform as a Preprocessing Step for Classification , 2008, 2008 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena.

[2]  J. A. Hunter,et al.  Discrimination of multiple PD sources using wavelet decomposition and principal component analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[3]  D. Culler,et al.  Comparison of methods , 2000 .

[4]  L. Hao,et al.  Partial discharge source discrimination using a support vector machine , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[5]  A.E.B. Abu-Elanien,et al.  Survey on the Transformer Condition Monitoring , 2007, 2007 Large Engineering Systems Conference on Power Engineering.

[6]  J. A. Hunter,et al.  Comparison of two partial discharge classification methods , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[8]  Tapan Kumar Saha,et al.  Review of modern diagnostic techniques for assessing insulation condition in aged transformers , 2003 .

[9]  Mang-Hui Wang,et al.  Partial discharge pattern recognition of current transformers using an ENN , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[10]  J. A. Hunter,et al.  Identification of multiple partial discharge sources in high voltage transformer windings , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP).

[11]  Jitka Fuhr Procedure for identification and localization of dangerous PD sources in power transformers , 2005 .

[12]  S. Tenbohlen,et al.  Detection and location of partial discharges in power transformers using acoustic and electromagnetic signals , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[13]  Jashandeep Singh,et al.  Condition Monitoring of Power Transformers - Bibliography Survey , 2008, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.

[14]  P. Rapisarda,et al.  Construction of finite impulse wavelet filter for partial discharge localisation inside a transformer winding , 2013, 2013 IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC).