Compositionality and Biologically Plausible Models

The breadth of this handbook demonstrates the diversity of approaches to compositionality that characterize current research. Understanding how structured representations are formed and manipulated has been a long-standing challenge for those investigating the complexities of cognition. Fodor and Pylyshyn (1988) and Jackendoff (2002) have provided detailed discussions of the problems faced by any theory purporting to describe how such systems can occur in the physical brain. In particular, neural cognitive theories must not only identify how to neurally instantiate the rapid construction and transformation of compositional structures, but also provide explanatory advantages over classical symbolic approaches.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[2]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.

[3]  J. Fodor,et al.  Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution doesn't work , 1990, Cognition.

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton Tensor Product Variable Binding and the Representation of Symbolic Structures in Connectionist Systems , 1991 .

[5]  T. Poggio,et al.  Multiplying with synapses and neurons , 1992 .

[6]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Information Processing in Dendritic Trees , 1994, Neural Computation.

[7]  Tony A. Plate,et al.  Holographic reduced representations , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[8]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[9]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .

[10]  Brian P. McLaughlin Classical Constituents in Smolensky’s ICS Architecture , 1997 .

[11]  J.F.A.K. van Benthem,et al.  Structures and Norms in Science , 1997 .

[12]  D. Crystal The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language , 1998 .

[13]  A. Burkhalter,et al.  Connectivity of GABAergic calretinin-immunoreactive neurons in rat primary visual cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[16]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  A general framework for neurobiological modeling: an application to the vestibular system , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[17]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. , 2003, Psychological review.

[18]  Ross W. Gayler Vector Symbolic Architectures answer Jackendoff's challenges for cognitive neuroscience , 2004, ArXiv.

[19]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Neural Engineering: Computation, Representation, and Dynamics in Neurobiological Systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[20]  Sen Song,et al.  Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits , 2005, PLoS biology.

[21]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  A Controlled Attractor Network Model of Path Integration in the Rat , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[22]  C. Eliasmith Cognition with neurons: A large-scale, biologically realistic model of the Wason task , 2005 .

[23]  C. Anderson,et al.  A model of the computations leading to a representation of auditory space in the midbrain of the barn owl , 2005 .

[24]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Integrating behavioral and neural data in a model of zebrafish network interaction , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[25]  F. van der Velde,et al.  Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition , 2006, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  C. Eliasmith,et al.  Higher-Dimensional Neurons Explain the Tuning and Dynamics of Working Memory Cells , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Terrence C. Stewart,et al.  Building Production Systems with Realistic Spiking Neurons , 2008 .

[28]  Chris Eliasmith,et al.  Solving the Problem of Negative Synaptic Weights in Cortical Models , 2008, Neural Computation.