CHAPTER 8 – Visual field theory and methods

[1]  M. F. Armaly.  Selective perimetry for glaucomatous defects in ocular hypertension. , 1972, Archives of ophthalmology.

[2]  C. Johnson,et al.  Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Dimitrakos,et al.  Long-Term Follow-up of Glaucomatous Fields by Computerized (OCTOPUS-) Perimetry , 1987 .

[4]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Anatomy of a supergroup: does a criterion of normal perimetric performance generate a supernormal population? , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Mario Zingirian,et al.  Effects of Random Presentation on Kinetic Threshold , 1985 .

[6]  J Caprioli,et al.  Priority of test locations for automated perimetry in glaucoma. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[7]  A. Adams,et al.  Central visual fields for short wavelength sensitive pathways in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  William J Feuer,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[9]  A Heijl,et al.  Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Sommer,et al.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  J. Katz,et al.  Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Richard K. Morgan,et al.  Statpac 2 glaucoma change probability. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  R. Leblanc,et al.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus-Program G1 , 1994, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[15]  M. F. Armaly.  Ocular pressure and visual fields. A ten-year follow-up study. , 1969, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  A J Adams,et al.  Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[17]  C. Johnson,et al.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Skalej,et al.  Scotoma perception in white-noise-field campimetry and postchiasmal visual pathway lesions. , 1995, German journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  P A Sample,et al.  Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  M Fingeret.  Clinical alternative for reducing the time needed to perform automated threshold perimetry. , 1995, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[21]  A. Sommer,et al.  Automated perimetry detects visual field loss before manual Goldmann perimetry. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Comparison of different screening methods for the detection of visual field defects in early glaucoma , 2005, International Ophthalmology.

[23]  W E Sponsel,et al.  Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. , 1996, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  J. Felius,et al.  Functional characteristics of blue-on-yellow perimetric thresholds in glaucoma. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  M B Shields,et al.  Peripheral visual field testing by automated kinetic perimetry in glaucoma. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[27]  S. Drance,et al.  Visual field screening in glaucoma. An evaluation of the Armaly technique for screening glaucomatous visual fields. , 1973, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  M. Schaumberger,et al.  Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  J. Nordmann,et al.  Static Threshold Visual Field in Glaucoma with the Fastpac™ Algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser is the Gain in Examination Time Offset by Any Loss of Information? , 1994, European journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  P. Wishart.  Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss , 1993, Eye.

[31]  J. Schuman,et al.  Automated perimetry: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[32]  H. Taylor,et al.  Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry. , 1994, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  W. Feuer,et al.  Evaluation of baseline-related suprathreshold testing for quick determination of visual field nonprogression. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  W. Green,et al.  The histology of human glaucoma cupping and optic nerve damage: clinicopathologic correlation in 21 eyes. , 1979, Ophthalmology.

[35]  M. B. Shields,et al.  Automated kinetic perimetry with two peripheral isopters in glaucoma. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[36]  D. Echelman,et al.  Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[37]  J. Wild,et al.  Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[38]  Development of a Visual Field Screening Test Using a Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer , 1985 .

[39]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. , 1999, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[40]  E. Aulhorn,et al.  Rauschfeldkampimetrie - Eine neuartige perimetrische Untersuchungsweise , 1988 .

[41]  M F Armaly.  Visual field defects in early open angle glaucoma. , 1971, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[42]  T J Naduvilath,et al.  Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[43]  Boel Bengtsson,et al.  A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  F. Fankhauser,et al.  A comparison of five methods for estimating general glaucomatous visual field depression , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[45]  A hand-held OKP chart for the screening of glaucoma: Preliminary evaluation , 1990, Eye.

[46]  FOVEAL AND NON‐FOVEAL MEASURES OF SHORT WAVELENGTH SENSITIVE PATHWAYS IN GLAUCOMA AND OCULAR HYPERTENSION * , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[47]  B. Damato,et al.  The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: Which points are best for screening? , 1989, Eye.

[48]  H. Quigley,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters , 1994, Eye.

[49]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. , 1998, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[50]  F. Zwas,et al.  PERG and spectral sensitivity in ocular hypertensive and chronic open-angle glaucoma patients , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[51]  G E Trope,et al.  Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[52]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA (Swedish Interactive Test Algorithm), in normal subjects , 1998 .

[53]  M. Greve,et al.  Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser. , 1993, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology-journal Canadien D Ophtalmologie.

[54]  R. Leblanc,et al.  Normal visual fields measured with Octopus Program G1 , 1994, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[55]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[56]  D. Youn,et al.  Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect using a screening program of Humphrey Field Analyzer. , 1990, Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO.

[57]  J M Wild,et al.  Long‐term follow‐up of baseline learning and fatigue effects in the automated perimetry of glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients , 1991, Acta ophthalmologica.