Power-law behavior of transcription factor dynamics at the single-molecule level implies a continuum affinity model

Single-molecule tracking (SMT) allows the study of transcription factor (TF) dynamics in the nucleus, giving important information regarding the diffusion and binding behavior of these proteins in the nuclear environment. Dwell time distributions obtained by SMT for most TFs appear to follow bi-exponential behavior. This has been ascribed to two discrete populations of TFs––one non-specifically bound to chromatin and another specifically bound to target sites, as implied by decades of biochemical studies. However, emerging studies suggest alternate models for dwell-time distributions, indicating the exis-tence of more than two populations of TFs (multi-exponential distribution), or even the absence of discrete states altogether (power-law distribution). Here, we present an analytical pipeline to evaluate which model best explains SMT data. We find that a broad spectrum of TFs (including glucocorticoid receptor, oestrogen receptor, FOXA1, CTCF) follow a power-law distribution of dwell-times, blurring the temporal line between non-specific and specific binding, suggesting that productive binding may involve longer binding events than previously believed. From these observations, we propose a continuum of affinities model to explain TF dynamics, that is consistent with complex interactions of TFs with multiple nuclear domains as well as binding and searching on the chromatin template.

[1]  A. Upadhyaya,et al.  An intrinsically disordered region-mediated confinement state contributes to the dynamics and function of transcription factors. , 2021, Molecular cell.

[2]  J. Lerner,et al.  Two-Parameter Mobility Assessments Discriminate Diverse Regulatory Factor Behaviors in Chromatin. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[3]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Long-term association of a transcription factor with its chromatin binding site can stabilize gene expression and cell fate commitment , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  N. Barkai,et al.  Intrinsically Disordered Regions Direct Transcription Factor In Vivo Binding Specificity. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[5]  Diego M. Presman,et al.  Unraveling the molecular interactions involved in phase separation of glucocorticoid receptor , 2020, BMC Biology.

[6]  J. Shendure,et al.  Mechanisms of Interplay between Transcription Factors and the 3D Genome. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[7]  Prabhakar R. Gudla,et al.  Transcriptional Bursting and Co-bursting Regulation by Steroid Hormone Release Pattern and Transcription Factor Mobility. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[8]  M. Depken,et al.  A unifying mechanistic model of bacterial transcription with three interconnected pause states and non-diffusive backtrack recovery , 2019 .

[9]  T. Misteli,et al.  Molecular basis and biological function of variability in spatial genome organization , 2019, Science.

[10]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Visualizing transcription: key to understanding gene expression dynamics. , 2019, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[11]  Achim P. Popp,et al.  Inferring quantity and qualities of superimposed reaction rates in single molecule survival time distributions , 2019, bioRxiv.

[12]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Live‐cell imaging reveals the interplay between transcription factors, nucleosomes, and bursting , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[13]  S. Manley,et al.  Single-molecule dynamics and genome-wide transcriptomics reveal that NF-kB (p65)-DNA binding times can be decoupled from transcriptional activation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[14]  Jens Michaelis,et al.  Single-molecule imaging of the transcription factor SRF reveals prolonged chromatin-binding kinetics upon cell stimulation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Anders S. Hansen,et al.  Guided nuclear exploration increases CTCF target search efficiency , 2018, bioRxiv.

[16]  J. McNally,et al.  Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Linked Cycles of RSC Chromatin Remodeling and Ace1p Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[17]  R. Tjian,et al.  Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription , 2018, Science.

[18]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control , 2018, Science.

[19]  X. Darzacq,et al.  Phase-separation mechanism for C-terminal hyperphosphorylation of RNA polymerase II , 2018, Nature.

[20]  R. Mann,et al.  Accurate and sensitive quantification of protein-DNA binding affinity , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Tjian,et al.  Visualizing transcription factor dynamics in living cells , 2018, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  Maxime Woringer,et al.  Protein motion in the nucleus: from anomalous diffusion to weak interactions , 2018, Biochemical Society transactions.

[23]  T. Hughes,et al.  The Human Transcription Factors , 2018, Cell.

[24]  P. Cramer,et al.  The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome , 2017, Nature.

[25]  C. Tacchetti,et al.  Live-cell p53 single-molecule binding is modulated by C-terminal acetylation and correlates with transcriptional activity , 2017, Nature Communications.

[26]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  Mapping the Dynamics of the Glucocorticoid Receptor within the Nuclear Landscape , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[27]  G. Hager,et al.  Single-molecule analysis of steroid receptor and cofactor action in living cells , 2017, Nature Communications.

[28]  Minoru Koyama,et al.  Visualizing long-term single-molecule dynamics in vivo by stochastic protein labeling , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Matthias Reisser,et al.  Direct Observation of Cell-Cycle-Dependent Interactions between CTCF and Chromatin , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[30]  R. Young,et al.  A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control , 2017, Cell.

[31]  I. Goldstein,et al.  Transcription factor assisted loading and enhancer dynamics dictate the hepatic fasting response. , 2017, Genome research.

[32]  M. Saxton Diffusion of DNA-binding species in the nucleus: A transient anomalous subdiffusion model , 2017, bioRxiv.

[33]  R. Tjian,et al.  CTCF and cohesin regulate chromatin loop stability with distinct dynamics , 2016, bioRxiv.

[34]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Corrigendum: Sequences flanking the core-binding site modulate glucocorticoid receptor structure and activity , 2016, Nature Communications.

[35]  G. Hager,et al.  More than meets the dimer: What is the quaternary structure of the glucocorticoid receptor? , 2016, Transcription.

[36]  Huy Nguyen Duc,et al.  Live-cell single-molecule tracking reveals co-recognition of H3K27me3 and DNA targets polycomb Cbx7-PRC1 to chromatin , 2016, eLife.

[37]  J. McNally,et al.  Single molecule tracking of Ace1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae defines a characteristic residence time for non-specific interactions of transcription factors with chromatin , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  R. Tjian,et al.  A dynamic mode of mitotic bookmarking by transcription factors , 2016, bioRxiv.

[39]  I. Goldstein,et al.  Steroid Receptors Reprogram FoxA1 Occupancy through Dynamic Chromatin Transitions , 2016, Cell.

[40]  M. Dahan,et al.  Single molecule study of non-specific binding kinetics of LacI in mammalian cells. , 2015, Faraday discussions.

[41]  M. Dahan,et al.  Probing the target search of DNA-binding proteins in mammalian cells using TetR as model searcher , 2015, Nature Communications.

[42]  T. Nomura,et al.  Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals Dynamics of CREB Transcription Factor Bound to Its Target Sequence , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[43]  J. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Dynamics of chromatin accessibility and long-range interactions in response to glucocorticoid pulsing , 2015, Genome research.

[44]  J. J. Macklin,et al.  A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy , 2014, Nature Methods.

[45]  Raluca Gordân,et al.  Protein−DNA binding in the absence of specific base-pair recognition , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  J. McNally,et al.  Single molecule analysis of transcription factor binding at transcription sites in live cells , 2014, Nature Communications.

[47]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Single-Molecule Dynamics of Enhanceosome Assembly in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[48]  David van der Spoel,et al.  Transcription-factor binding and sliding on DNA studied using micro- and macroscopic models , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  A. Coulon,et al.  Eukaryotic transcriptional dynamics: from single molecules to cell populations , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[50]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[51]  Victor V Lobanenkov,et al.  A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. , 2013, Cell reports.

[52]  X. Xie,et al.  Single Molecule Imaging of Transcription Factor Binding to DNA in Live Mammalian Cells , 2013, Nature Methods.

[53]  I. Kohane Faculty Opinions recommendation of Mathematics. Critical truths about power laws. , 2012 .

[54]  Marcel Geertz,et al.  Massively parallel measurements of molecular interaction kinetics on a microfluidic platform , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors , 2012, Genome research.

[56]  J. McNally,et al.  A benchmark for chromatin binding measurements in live cells , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[57]  Ralf Metzler,et al.  Generalized facilitated diffusion model for DNA-binding proteins with search and recognition states. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[58]  James G. McNally,et al.  Assembly of the transcription machinery: ordered and stable, random and dynamic, or both? , 2011, Chromosoma.

[59]  V. Dahirel,et al.  Nonspecific DNA-protein interaction: why proteins can diffuse along DNA. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[60]  Raja Jothi,et al.  Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein–DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  K. Jaqaman,et al.  Robust single particle tracking in live cell time-lapse sequences , 2008, Nature Methods.

[62]  Kai Johnsson,et al.  An engineered protein tag for multiprotein labeling in living cells. , 2008, Chemistry & biology.

[63]  Jung-Chi Liao,et al.  Extending the absorbing boundary method to fit dwell-time distributions of molecular motors with complex kinetic pathways , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  M. Newman Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[65]  M. Tribus,et al.  Probability theory: the logic of science , 2003 .

[66]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  Kinetics of Core Histones in Living Human Cells , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[67]  M. Ewen Where the cell cycle and histones meet. , 2000, Genes & development.

[68]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[69]  J. Bouchaud Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems , 1992 .

[70]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications , 1990 .

[71]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[72]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[73]  C Blomberg,et al.  Association kinetics with coupled diffusional flows. Special application to the lac repressor--operator system. , 1976, Biophysical chemistry.

[74]  Ido Goldstein,et al.  Dynamic enhancer function in the chromatin context , 2018, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[75]  J. McNally,et al.  Monitoring dynamic binding of chromatin proteins in vivo by single-molecule tracking. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[76]  T. Misteli,et al.  Transcription dynamics. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[77]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .