A Cell-Regulatory Mechanism Involving Feedback between Contraction and Tissue Formation Guides Wound Healing Progression

Wound healing is a process driven by cells. The ability of cells to sense mechanical stimuli from the extracellular matrix that surrounds them is used to regulate the forces that cells exert on the tissue. Stresses exerted by cells play a central role in wound contraction and have been broadly modelled. Traditionally, these stresses are assumed to be dependent on variables such as the extracellular matrix and cell or collagen densities. However, we postulate that cells are able to regulate the healing process through a mechanosensing mechanism regulated by the contraction that they exert. We propose that cells adjust the contraction level to determine the tissue functions regulating all main activities, such as proliferation, differentiation and matrix production. Hence, a closed-regulatory feedback loop is proposed between contraction and tissue formation. The model consists of a system of partial differential equations that simulates the evolution of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, collagen and a generic growth factor, as well as the deformation of the extracellular matrix. This model is able to predict the wound healing outcome without requiring the addition of phenomenological laws to describe the time-dependent contraction evolution. We have reproduced two in vivo experiments to evaluate the predictive capacity of the model, and we conclude that there is feedback between the level of cell contraction and the tissue regenerated in the wound.

[1]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[2]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Numerical modeling of a mechano-chemical theory for wound contraction analysis , 2009 .

[3]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  A. Singer,et al.  Cutaneous wound healing. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Savita Khanna,et al.  Characterization of a preclinical model of chronic ischemic wound. , 2009, Physiological genomics.

[7]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[8]  James D. Murray Dermal Wound Healing , 1993 .

[9]  H. Ehrlich,et al.  Fibroblast expression of α-smooth muscle actin, α2β1 integrin and αvβ3 integrin: influence of surface rigidity. , 2011, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[10]  C. Guidry Extracellular matrix contraction by fibroblasts: Peptide promoters and second messengers , 1992, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[11]  E Reina-Romo,et al.  An Interspecies Computational Study on Limb Lengthening , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-beta induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts. , 1999, The American journal of pathology.

[13]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  Adhesion dynamics and durotaxis in migrating cells , 2011, Physical biology.

[14]  A. Desmoulière,et al.  Apoptosis mediates the decrease in cellularity during the transition between granulation tissue and scar. , 1995, The American journal of pathology.

[15]  B. Hinz,et al.  Mechanical tension controls granulation tissue contractile activity and myofibroblast differentiation. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[16]  M. McGrath,et al.  Wound Geometry and the Kinetics of Wound Contraction , 1983, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  John A. Adam,et al.  A simplified model of wound healing (with particular reference to the critical size defect) , 1999 .

[18]  Jie Li,et al.  Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. , 2007, Clinics in dermatology.

[19]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Mechanical waves during tissue expansion , 2012, Nature Physics.

[20]  G. Gabbiani,et al.  Mechanisms of myofibroblast activity and phenotypic modulation. , 1999, Experimental cell research.

[21]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  Continuum model of fibroblast-driven wound contraction: inflammation-mediation. , 1992, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  E. Howard,et al.  Transforming growth factor-beta1 promotes the morphological and functional differentiation of the myofibroblast. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[24]  Philip K Maini,et al.  A Fibrocontractive Mechanochemical Model of Dermal Wound Closure Incorporating Realistic Growth Factor Kinetics , 2012, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[25]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Alain Richert,et al.  Real-time single-cell response to stiffness , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Lagarde,et al.  Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy , 2004, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[28]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Gary R. Grotendorst,et al.  Attachment of smooth muscle cells to collagen and their migration toward platelet-derived growth factor. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  H. Sorg,et al.  Wound Repair and Regeneration , 2012, European Surgical Research.

[31]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Mann,et al.  Stabilization of integrin‐linked kinase by the Hsp90‐CHIP axis impacts cellular force generation, migration and the fibrotic response , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[33]  D. Bluestein,et al.  Pressure ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management. , 2008, American family physician.

[34]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Dynamic Mechanisms of Cell Rigidity Sensing: Insights from a Computational Model of Actomyosin Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  Hans C. Korting,et al.  Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloids: Pathomechanisms and Current and Emerging Treatment Strategies , 2011, Molecular medicine.

[36]  Rei Ogawa,et al.  Mechanobiology of scarring , 2011, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[37]  James D. Murray,et al.  Spatial pattern formation in biology: I. Dermal wound healing. II. Bacterial patterns , 1998 .

[38]  D L Sean McElwain,et al.  A two-compartment mechanochemical model of the roles of transforming growth factor β and tissue tension in dermal wound healing. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[40]  F. Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. , 2000, Trends in cell biology.

[41]  L O,et al.  A Mechanochemical Model for Adult Dermal Wound Contraction and the Permanence of the Contracted Tissue Displacement Profile , 1995 .

[42]  Giulio Gabbiani,et al.  Mechanisms of force generation and transmission by myofibroblasts. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[43]  J D Murray,et al.  Mathematical analysis of a basic model for epidermal wound healing , 1991, Journal of mathematical biology.

[44]  R. Wells The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior , 2008, Hepatology.

[45]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  J A Sherratt,et al.  A mathematical model for fibro-proliferative wound healing disorders. , 1996, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[47]  M. Sporn,et al.  Transforming growth factor type beta: rapid induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis in vivo and stimulation of collagen formation in vitro. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Matthias Chiquet,et al.  How do fibroblasts translate mechanical signals into changes in extracellular matrix production? , 2003, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[49]  Pedro Moreo,et al.  Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[50]  B. Hinz,et al.  Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  Yubin Shi,et al.  Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[52]  Philip Kollmannsberger,et al.  How Linear Tension Converts to Curvature: Geometric Control of Bone Tissue Growth , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  C. McCulloch,et al.  The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-β induction of α-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts , 1999 .