Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.

: Subitizing," the process of enumeration when there are fewer than 4 items, is rapid (40-100 ms/item), effortless, and accurate. "Counting," the process of enumeration when there are more than 4 items, is slow (250-350 ms/item), effortful, and error-prone. Why is there a difference in the way the small and large numbers of items are enumerated? A theory of enumeration is proposed that emerges from a general theory of vision, yet explains the numeric abilities of preverbal infants, children, and adults. We argue that subitizing exploits a limited-capacity parallel mechanism for item individuation, the FINST mechanism, associated with the multiple target tracking task (Pylyshyn, 1989; Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988). Two kinds of evidence support the claim that subitizing relies on preattentive information, whereas counting requires spatial attention. First, whenever spatial attention is needed to compute a spatial relation (cf. Ullman, 1984) or to perform feature integration (cf. Treisman & Gelade, 1980), subitizing does not occur (Trick & Pylyshyn, 1993a). Second, the position of the attentional focus, as manipulated by cue validity, has a greater effect on counting than subitizing latencies (Trick & Pylyshyn, 1993b).

[1]  W. STANLEY JEVONS,et al.  The Power of Numerical Discrimination , 1871, Nature.

[2]  Howard C. Warren,et al.  The reaction time of counting. , 1897 .

[3]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  Fechner's law and the method of equal appearing intervals. , 1929 .

[4]  東北大学,et al.  Tohoku psychologica folia , 1933 .

[5]  W. S. Hunter,et al.  The span of visual discrimination as a function of time and intensity of stimulation. , 1940 .

[6]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of span of attention. , 1948, The Journal of psychology.

[7]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  Robert Edward Taubman,et al.  Studies in Judged Number: II. The Judgment of Visual Number , 1950 .

[9]  E. M. Jensen,et al.  The subitizing and counting of visually presented fields of dots. , 1950 .

[10]  R. Woodworth,et al.  Experimental psychology, Rev. ed. , 1954 .

[11]  S. Sternberg.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 1966, Science.

[12]  M. Potter,et al.  Spatial enumeration without counting. , 1968, Child development.

[13]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry , 1969 .

[14]  Guy J. Groen,et al.  Temporal aspects of simple addition and comparison , 1971 .

[15]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[16]  David Klahr,et al.  A PRODUCTION SYSTEM FOR COUNTING, SUBITIZING AND ADDING , 1973 .

[17]  Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al.  The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .

[18]  V. Glezer,et al.  Investigation of complex and hypercomplex receptive fields of visual cortex of the cat as spatial frequency filters. , 1973, Vision research.

[19]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[20]  R. Haber,et al.  Perceived numerosity: an information processing analysis. , 1975, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  D. Klahr,et al.  Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults. , 1975, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[22]  D. Allport.  The state of cognitive psychology. , 1975 .

[23]  R. Gelman,et al.  Further Investigations of the Young Child's Conception of Number. , 1975 .

[24]  J. G. Wallace,et al.  Cognitive development: An information-processing view , 1976 .

[25]  F. Campbell,et al.  The Magic Number 4 ± 0: A New Look at Visual Numerosity Judgements , 1976, Perception.

[26]  Tamio Aoki.  On the counting process of patterned dots. , 1977 .

[27]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  O Akin,et al.  Quantification of three-dimensional structures. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  O. Svenson,et al.  Subitizing and counting processes in young children , 1978 .

[30]  Stanley Coren,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[31]  S. Coren,et al.  In Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[32]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[33]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: The pop-out effect poops out , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  P. Starkey,et al.  Perception of numbers by human infants. , 1980, Science.

[36]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  T. Oyama,et al.  Span of attention, backward masking, and reaction time , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Psychological explanations and knowledge-dependent processes , 1981, Cognition.

[40]  S. Ullman,et al.  The Interpretation of Visual Motion , 1981 .

[41]  Dietrich Simons,et al.  What is magic about the magical number four? , 1982 .

[42]  Hank Davis,et al.  Counting behavior in animals: A critical evaluation. , 1982 .

[43]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  P. G. Vos,et al.  Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[45]  J. Beck.  Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[46]  G. Mandler,et al.  Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  D. LaBerge.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  A. Reeves,et al.  Interruption of Dot Processing by a Backward Mask , 1983, Perception.

[50]  Y. Tsal.  Movements of attention across the visual field. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[52]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  Dynamic aspects of neocortical function , 1984 .

[53]  B. Julesz,et al.  Detection versus Discrimination of Visual Orientation , 1984, Perception.

[54]  S. Ullman.  Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[55]  Hank Davis,et al.  Discrimination of the number three by a raccoon (Procyon lotor) , 1984 .

[56]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual attention and stimulus identification. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[59]  H Davis,et al.  Detection of number or numerousness by human infants. , 1985, Science.

[60]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  S. Ullman,et al.  Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[63]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Cognitive processes in counting. , 1987 .

[66]  E Howe,et al.  Judgment of numerosity: effects of symmetry and goodness in dot pattern arrays. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[67]  R W Frick.  The homogeneity effect in counting , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[68]  H Egeth,et al.  Subitizing: Direct apprehension or serial processing? , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[70]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[71]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  M. Mozer.  Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  J. Enns.  The Development of attention : research and theory , 1990 .

[75]  D. Sagi,et al.  Vision outside the focus of attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  M. Arbib,et al.  Vision, brain, and cooperative computation , 1990 .

[77]  M. Posner,et al.  Chapter 3 Regulatory Mechanisms in Infant Development , 1990 .

[78]  James T. Enns,et al.  2 The Nature of Selectivity in Early Human Vision , 1992 .

[79]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[80]  D. Sagi,et al.  Visual attention and perceptual grouping , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[81]  B. Burns.  Percepts, concepts, and categories : the representation and processing of information , 1992 .

[82]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.