Adaptive Transition Probability Matrix-Based Parallel IMM Algorithm

Conventionally, the transition probabilities in the interacting multiple model (IMM) are often fixed based on the prior information. However, this conservative setting may result in inaccurate state estimations. To solve this problem, a Bayesian-based online correction function is proposed in this paper, which can adaptively adjust the transition probabilities. To deal with the response lag and the short-term peak estimation error problem during the respond to model jump, a model jumping threshold is defined, so that the current information of the models can be fully utilized by the IMM algorithm and the correction function of the transition probabilities can be further improved. Subsequently, an adaptive transition probability-based parallel IMM algorithm is proposed in this paper. Finally, three maneuvering target tracking simulations are conducted to verify the performance of the proposed algorithm, the results show that the proposed algorithm can improve the response speed of the system model jump and the state estimation accuracy. The effectiveness and feasibility of the algorithm are proven.

[1]  X. R. Li,et al.  Online Bayesian estimation of transition probabilities for Markovian jump systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Tong Zhang,et al.  Design of Highly Nonlinear Substitution Boxes Based on I-Ching Operators , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[3]  Peter Willett,et al.  A comparison of multiple-IMM estimation approaches using EKF, UKF, and PF for impact point prediction , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[4]  Peter S. Maybeck,et al.  Characterization of Kalman filter residuals in the presence of mismodeling , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[5]  Weigang Ma,et al.  Mobile Target Tracking Based on Hybrid Open-Loop Monocular Vision Motion Control Strategy , 2015 .

[6]  C. L. Philip Chen,et al.  I-Ching Divination Evolutionary Algorithm and its Convergence Analysis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[7]  Neil Genzlinger A. and Q , 2006 .

[8]  Fei Liu,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Multiple-Model Systems With Mismodeled Transition Probabilities , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  Changyin Sun,et al.  Model Identification and Control Design for a Humanoid Robot , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[10]  Chun Yang,et al.  Multi-Sensor Fusion with Interaction Multiple Model and Chi-Square Test Tolerant Filter , 2016, Sensors.

[11]  Henrique M. T. Menegaz,et al.  Switching Multiple Model Filter for Boost-Phase Missile Tracking , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Inseok Hwang,et al.  A Study on Stability of the Interacting Multiple Model Algorithm , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Javad Poshtan,et al.  Distributed Interacting Multiple Filters for Fault Diagnosis of Navigation Sensors in a Robotic System , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[14]  Wenling Li,et al.  An information theoretic approach to interacting multiple model estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[15]  Peter Willett,et al.  Systematic approach to IMM mixing for unequal dimension states , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[16]  Peter Willett,et al.  Predicting Time to Failure Using the IMM and Excitable Tests , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[17]  Hadaegh Mahmoudreza and Khaloozadeh Hamid Modified switched IMM estimator based on autoregressive extended Viterbi method for maneuvering target tracking , 2018 .

[18]  Inseok Hwang,et al.  Algorithm for Performance Analysis of the IMM Algorithm , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[19]  Liang Yan,et al.  Analysis on the Performance and Properties of Interacting Multiple Models Algorithm , 2001 .

[20]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Kalman filter versus IMM estimator: when do we need the latter? , 2003 .

[21]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  A Markov Chain-Based Testability Growth Model With a Cost-Benefit Function , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.