Chaperone-assisted protein folding.

Molecular chaperones of the Hsp70 and chaperonin families are basic constituents of the cellular machinery that mediates protein folding. Recent functional and structural studies corroborate existing models for the mechanism of these components. Highlights of the past year include the X-ray crystallographic analysis of the peptide-binding domain of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 homolog, DnaK, the direct demonstration of protein folding in the central cavity of the chaperonin GroEL, and the visualization of conformational changes in GroEL during the chaperonin folding cycle.

[1]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the ATPase fragment of a 70K heat-shock cognate protein , 1990, Nature.

[2]  R. Rimerman,et al.  Mutational analysis of the hsp70-interacting protein Hip , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[3]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes , 1995, Cell.

[4]  F. Hartl,et al.  Principles of Chaperone-Assisted Protein Folding: Differences Between in Vitro and in Vivo Mechanisms , 1996, Science.

[5]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  NMR structure determination of the Escherichia coli DnaJ molecular chaperone: secondary structure and backbone fold of the N-terminal region (residues 2-108) containing the highly conserved J domain. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Hong Wang,et al.  The peptide-binding domain of the chaperone protein Hsc70 has an unusual secondary structure topology. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[7]  W. Burkholder,et al.  Specificity of DnaK-peptide binding. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Helen R Saibil,et al.  The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL , 1996, Cell.

[9]  S. High,et al.  Early events in preprotein recognition in E. coli: interaction of SRP and trigger factor with nascent polypeptides. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[10]  J. Prestegard,et al.  1H and 15N magnetic resonance assignments, secondary structure, and tertiary fold of Escherichia coli DnaJ(1-78). , 1995, Biochemistry.

[11]  F. Hartl,et al.  The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Kessel,et al.  The protein-folding activity of chaperonins correlates with the symmetric GroEL14(GroES7)2 heterooligomer. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Structure-Function Analysis of the Zinc Finger Region of the DnaJ Molecular Chaperone* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  M. Kessel,et al.  Characterization of a functional GroEL14(GroES7)2 chaperonin hetero-oligomer. , 1994, Science.

[15]  J Vandekerckhove,et al.  Cofactor A is a molecular chaperone required for beta-tubulin folding: functional and structural characterization. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[16]  F. Hartl,et al.  A zinc finger‐like domain of the molecular chaperone DnaJ is involved in binding to denatured protein substrates. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[17]  W. Tap,et al.  Quasi-native Chaperonin-bound Intermediates in Facilitated Protein Folding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  F. Hartl,et al.  Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL‐bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  H. Lütcke,et al.  Escherichia coli trigger factor is a prolyl isomerase that associates with nascent polypeptide chains. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  F. Hartl,et al.  Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding , 1992, Nature.

[21]  E. Craig,et al.  The Dissociation of ATP from hsp70 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Stimulated by Both Ydj1p and Peptide Substrates (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  J. Rothman,et al.  Peptide-binding specificity of the molecular chaperone BiP , 1991, Nature.

[23]  S. Watson,et al.  Direct evidence that the glucocorticoid receptor binds to hsp90 at or near the termination of receptor translation in vitro. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex , 1996, Nature.

[25]  F. Hartl,et al.  Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL‐mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[26]  R Hlodan,et al.  Molecular chaperones in protein folding: the art of avoiding sticky situations. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[27]  A. Matouschek,et al.  Hsp60‐independent protein folding in the matrix of yeast mitochondria. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[28]  F. Schmid,et al.  A ribosome‐associated peptidyl‐prolyl cis/trans isomerase identified as the trigger factor. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[29]  A. Clarke.  Molecular chaperones in protein folding and translocation. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[32]  T. Langer,et al.  The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding , 1993, Nature.

[33]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis of Amide Proton Exchange by the Molecular Chaperones GroEL and SecB , 1996, Science.

[34]  B. Bukau,et al.  Substrate shuttling between the DnaK and GroEL systems indicates a chaperone network promoting protein folding. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[36]  A. Fink,et al.  Conformational characterization of DnaK and its complexes by small-angle X-ray scattering. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[37]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL , 1994, Nature.

[38]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  The Minimal Gene Complement of Mycoplasma genitalium , 1995, Science.

[39]  J. Weissman,et al.  Characterization of the Active Intermediate of a GroEL–GroES-Mediated Protein Folding Reaction , 1996, Cell.

[40]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[41]  W R Taylor,et al.  A hypothetical model for the peptide binding domain of hsp70 based on the peptide binding domain of HLA. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[42]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  J. Weissman,et al.  Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex , 1996, Nature.

[44]  J. Dice,et al.  Roles of molecular chaperones in protein degradation , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  Christophe Ampe,et al.  Pathway Leading to Correctly Folded β-Tubulin , 1996, Cell.

[46]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Functional significance of symmetrical versus asymmetrical GroEL-GroES chaperonin complexes , 1995, Science.

[47]  S. Lindquist,et al.  HSP100/Clp proteins: a common mechanism explains diverse functions. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[48]  R. Fleischmann,et al.  Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. , 1995, Science.

[49]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The Conserved G/F Motif of the DnaJ Chaperone Is Necessary for the Activation of the Substrate Binding Properties of the DnaK Chaperone (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  L. Vigh,et al.  Fluorescence Detection of Symmetric GroEL14(GroES7)2 Heterooligomers Involved in Protein Release during the Chaperonin Cycle* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[52]  J. Martín,et al.  Asymmetrical interaction of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding , 1995, Science.

[53]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES , 1993, Nature.

[54]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Inter-ring communication is disrupted in the GroEL mutant Arg13 --> Gly; Ala126 --> Val with known crystal structure. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  P. Christen,et al.  Kinetics of molecular chaperone action. , 1994, Science.

[56]  Carl Frieden,et al.  Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[57]  G. Lorimer,et al.  A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[58]  Judith Frydman,et al.  Folding of nascent polypeptide chains in a high molecular mass assembly with molecular chaperones , 1994, Nature.

[59]  R. Ellis.  Molecular Chaperones: Opening and closing the Anfinsen cage , 1994, Current Biology.

[60]  R. Jaenicke,et al.  Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. , 1994, Science.

[61]  J. Höhfeld,et al.  Characterization of Functional Domains of the Eukaryotic Co-chaperone Hip* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[62]  C. Gross,et al.  Analysis of Three DnaK Mutant Proteins Suggests That Progression through the ATPase Cycle Requires Conformational Changes (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[63]  A. Karzai,et al.  A Bipartite Signaling Mechanism Involved in DnaJ-mediated Activation of the Escherichia coli DnaK Protein (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[64]  R. Morimoto,et al.  Identification of a regulatory motif in Hsp70 that affects ATPase activity, substrate binding and interaction with HDJ‐1. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[65]  S. Mande,et al.  Structure of the Heat Shock Protein Chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium leprae , 1996, Science.

[66]  A. Clarke,et al.  The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  F. Hartl,et al.  Regulation of the Heat-shock Protein 70 Reaction Cycle by the Mammalian DnaJ Homolog, Hsp40* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[68]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Hydrolysis of adenosine 5'-triphosphate by Escherichia coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium ion. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[69]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[70]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Common and divergent peptide binding specificities of hsp70 molecular chaperones. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[71]  Craig M. Ogata,et al.  Structural Analysis of Substrate Binding by the Molecular Chaperone DnaK , 1996, Science.

[72]  J. Buchner,et al.  Assisting spontaneity: the role of Hsp90 and small Hsps as molecular chaperones. , 1994, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[73]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Escherichia coli DnaJ and GrpE heat shock proteins jointly stimulate ATPase activity of DnaK. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  C. Dobson,et al.  Conformation of GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry , 1994, Nature.

[75]  F. Hartl.  Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding , 1996, Nature.

[76]  T. Atkinson,et al.  Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[77]  J R Glover,et al.  Support for the Prion Hypothesis for Inheritance of a Phenotypic Trait in Yeast , 1996, Science.

[78]  F. Hartl,et al.  Hip, a novel cochaperone involved in the eukaryotic hsc70/hsp40 reaction cycle , 1995, Cell.

[79]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  M. Douglas,et al.  A Conserved HPD Sequence of the J-domain Is Necessary for YDJ1 Stimulation of Hsp70 ATPase Activity at a Site Distinct from Substrate Binding (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[81]  B. Bukau,et al.  Identification of the prolyl isomerase domain of Escherichia coli trigger factor , 1996, FEBS letters.

[82]  J Vandekerckhove,et al.  A novel cochaperonin that modulates the ATPase activity of cytoplasmic chaperonin , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[83]  R. Rimerman,et al.  Molecular cloning of human p48, a transient component of progesterone receptor complexes and an Hsp70-binding protein. , 1996, Molecular endocrinology.

[84]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution , 1996, Nature.

[85]  Y Q Qian,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the human Hsp40 (HDJ-1) J-domain. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[86]  A. Fersht,et al.  Cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis by GroEL is increased by GroES , 1991, FEBS letters.

[87]  Neil A. Ranson,et al.  Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL–GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy , 1994, Nature.

[88]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  NMR structure of the J-domain and the Gly/Phe-rich region of the Escherichia coli DnaJ chaperone. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[89]  A. Fersht,et al.  Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[90]  R. Morimoto,et al.  The human cytosolic molecular chaperones hsp90, hsp70 (hsc70) and hdj‐1 have distinct roles in recognition of a non‐native protein and protein refolding. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[91]  S W Liebman,et al.  Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [psi+]. , 1995, Science.

[92]  S. Sprang,et al.  Affinity panning of a library of peptides displayed on bacteriophages reveals the binding specificity of BiP , 1993, Cell.

[93]  G. Lorimer,et al.  A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[94]  F. Hartl,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate , 1991, Nature.

[95]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196-->Ala. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[96]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The NH2-terminal 108 amino acids of the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK and are sufficient for lambda replication. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[97]  J. Reinstein,et al.  The role of ATP in the functional cycle of the DnaK chaperone system. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[98]  E. Conway de Macario,et al.  A dnaK homolog in the archaebacterium Methanosarcina mazei S6. , 1991, Gene.