Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Modeling of Different Coil Configurations

Objective: Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) has been recently used in several clinical studies as diagnostic and therapeutic tool. However, electric field (E) distributions induced in the brain by dTMS are still unknown. This paper provides a characterization of the induced E distributions in the brain of a realistic human model due to 16 different coil configurations. Methods: The scalar potential finite-element method was used to calculate the E distributions differentiating the brain structures, e.g., cortex, white matter, anterior cingulated cortex, cerebellum, thalamus, hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, amygdale, and hippocampus. Results: Our results support that the double cone coils and the large diameter circular coils are more prone to activate deeper brain structures but are also characterized by a reduced focality on the surface of the cortex, with the consequent possible counter effect of stimulating regions not of interest. The Hesed coils, although their ability to reach deep brain tissues is lower, seem to be more able to reduce the effect on other brain regions where the stimulation is undesired. Conclusion: All the coil configurations resulted subjected to a depth-focality tradeoff. Significance: Since there is not a configuration that is capable of achieving a stimulation both deep and focal, the selection of the most suitable coil settings for a specific clinical application should be based on a balanced evaluation between these two different needs.

[1]  Sarah H. Lisanby,et al.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2014, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Zangen,et al.  Effectiveness of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with a Brief Exposure Procedure in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder – A Pilot Study , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  Alon Amir,et al.  Three-Dimensional Distribution of the Electric Field Induced in the Brain by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using Figure-8 and Deep H-Coils , 2007, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[4]  Shoogo Ueno,et al.  Calculating the electric field in real human head by transcranial magnetic stimulation with shield plate , 2009 .

[5]  Marta Parazzini,et al.  Modelling of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation: Different coil configurations , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Shuo Yang,et al.  Circular Coil Array Model for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[7]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Abraham Zangen,et al.  Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation add-on for treatment of negative symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia: a feasibility study. , 2011, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[9]  Leor N. Katz,et al.  Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex: Evaluation of antidepressant and cognitive effects in depressive patients , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  P. Enticott,et al.  Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Psychiatric Disorders: A Comprehensive Review , 2013, European Psychiatry.

[11]  Roberto Tatarelli,et al.  Efficacy of add-on deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in comorbid alcohol dependence and dysthymic disorder: three case reports. , 2013, The primary care companion for CNS disorders.

[12]  Alessia Paglialonga,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Estimation of the Electric Field and of the Current Density in an Anatomical Human Head Model , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Gaby S. Pell,et al.  Commentary on: Deng et al., Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[14]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Abraham Zangen,et al.  H-coil repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of bipolar depression: an add-on, safety and feasibility study , 2011, The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  P. Marketos,et al.  New Designs for Deep Brain Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Marta Parazzini,et al.  Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[19]  M. Hallett,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions: evidence for efficacy of the H-Coil , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Yevgen Melikhov,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: improved coil design for deep brain investigation , 2011 .

[21]  S. Lisanby,et al.  Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[22]  Frank Padberg,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Deep Brain Regions: Principles and Methods , 2007 .

[23]  Hamed Ekhtiari,et al.  Non-invasive Human Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer , 2015, Neuron.