Cytotoxicity tests of cellulose nanofibril-based structures

Cellulose nanofibrils based on wood pulp fibres are most promising for biomedical applications. Bacterial cellulose has been suggested for some medical applications and is presently used as wound dressing. However, cost-efficient processes for mass production of bacterial cellulose are lacking. Hence, fibrillation of cellulose wood fibres is most interesting, as the cellulose nanofibrils can efficiently be produced in large quantities. However, the utilization of cellulose nanofibrils from wood requires a thorough verification of its biocompatibility, especially with fibroblast cells which are important in regenerative tissue and particularly in wound healing. The cellulose nanofibril structures used in this study were based on Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres. The nanofibrillated materials were manufactured using a homogenizer without pre-treatment and with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxy radical as pre-treatment, thus yielding nanofibrils low and high level of anionic charge, respectively. From these materials, two types of nanofibril-based structures were formed; (1) thin and dense structures and (2) open and porous structures. Cytotoxicity tests were applied on the samples, which demonstrated that the nanofibrils do not exert acute toxic phenomena on the tested fibroblast cells (3T3 cells). The cell membrane, cell mitochondrial activity and the DNA proliferation remained unchanged during the tests, which involved direct and indirect contact between the nano-structured materials and the 3T3 cells. Some samples were modified using the crosslinking agent polyethyleneimine (PEI) or the surfactant cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The sample modified with CTAB showed a clear toxic behaviour, having negative effects on cell survival, viability and proliferation. CTAB is an antimicrobial component, and thus this result was as expected. The sample crosslinked with PEI also had a significant reduction in cell viability indicating a reduction in DNA proliferation. We conclude that the neat cellulose nanostructured materials tested in this study are not toxic against fibroblasts cells. This is most important as nano-structured materials based on nanofibrils from wood pulp fibres are promising as substrate for regenerative medicine and wound healing.

[1]  David B Warheit,et al.  Assessing toxicity of fine and nanoparticles: comparing in vitro measurements to in vivo pulmonary toxicity profiles. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  Jari Vartiainen,et al.  Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose , 2011 .

[3]  Jing Wang,et al.  Investigation of the figure of merit for filters with a single nanofiber layer on a substrate , 2008 .

[4]  V. Vishwakarma,et al.  Safety and Risk Associated with Nanoparticles - A Review , 2010 .

[5]  Wim H de Jong,et al.  The status of in vitro toxicity studies in the risk assessment of nanomaterials. , 2009, Nanomedicine.

[6]  Akira Isogai,et al.  Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[7]  H. Yano,et al.  Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15 nm from wood. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  Kristin Syverud,et al.  A comparative study of Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata pulp fibres as raw materials for production of cellulose nanofibrils , 2011 .

[9]  K. R. Sandberg,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential , 1983 .

[10]  F. M. Gama,et al.  BC nanofibres: in vitro study of genotoxicity and cell proliferation. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[11]  G. Chinga-Carrasco,et al.  Films made of cellulose nanofibrils: surface modification by adsorption of a cationic surfactant and characterization by computer-assisted electron microscopy , 2011 .

[12]  Gary Chinga-Carrasco,et al.  Quantitative Electron Microscopy of Cellulose Nanofibril Structures from Eucalyptus and Pinus radiata Kraft Pulp Fibers , 2011, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[13]  Solmaz Hajizadeh,et al.  Cross-linking cellulose nanofibrils for potential elastic cryo-structured gels , 2011, Nanoscale research letters.

[14]  G. Chinga-Carrasco.  Cellulose fibres, nanofibrils and microfibrils: The morphological sequence of MFC components from a plant physiology and fibre technology point of view , 2011, Nanoscale research letters.

[15]  M C Davies,et al.  Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  Shuping Dong,et al.  CYTOTOXICITY AND CELLULAR UPTAKE OF CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS , 2012 .

[17]  O. Ikkala,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[18]  Tanja Zimmermann,et al.  Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential , 2010 .

[19]  Kristin Syverud,et al.  On the structure and oxygen transmission rate of biodegradable cellulose nanobarriers , 2012, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[20]  Sophie Lanone,et al.  Comparative toxicity of 24 manufactured nanoparticles in human alveolar epithelial and macrophage cell lines , 2009, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[21]  E Borenfreund,et al.  Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. , 1985, Toxicology letters.