A methodology for comparing distances traveled by performance-equivalent fixed-route and demand responsive transit services

Abstract Public transport systems are confronted by the need to improve their economic effectiveness in order to meet customer requirements at acceptable costs for transit providers, which are often heavily subsidized. Our goal is to understand how the organizational form of the transit system impacts on system productivity. Our methodology consists of comparing performance in terms of distance traveled of two competing transit services, a traditional fixed-route and a demand responsive service, while ensuring a comparable service to the same set of customers. We consider several scenarios, which depend on the road network, service quality level, and demand density. According to our findings, demand responsive transit services perform better for high-quality service levels and low demand density scenarios.

[1]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Hybrid route generation heuristic algorithm for the design of transit networks , 1995 .

[2]  Cristina Pronello,et al.  The Impact of Different Organizational Forms of Road Public Transport on Distance Covered and Atmospheric Pollution , 2004 .

[3]  Marco Diana,et al.  Potential contributions of demand responsive transit services in reducing public transit pollutants emissions in metropolitan areas: an example for the city of Turin , 2003 .

[4]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Bus network design , 1986 .

[5]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Public transport values of time , 2004 .

[6]  Thérèse Steenberghen,et al.  Space and time related determinants of public transport use in trip chains , 2006 .

[7]  Hugo Gonzalez,et al.  Design of Bus Routes: Methodology and the Santo Domingo Case , 2002 .

[8]  C. Daganzo.  Checkpoint dial-a-ride systems , 1984 .

[9]  Shyue Koong Chang,et al.  Comparison of Subsidized Fixed- and Flexible-Route Bus Systems , 1996 .

[10]  Cristina Pronello,et al.  Emissions of demand responsive services as an alternative to conventional transit systems , 2007 .

[11]  R H Pratt,et al.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 10 - BUS ROUTING AND COVERAGE , 2004 .

[12]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  Some Issues Relating to the Optimal Design of Bus Routes , 1979 .

[13]  Marco Diana.  The importance of information flows temporal attributes for the efficient scheduling of dynamic demand responsive transport services , 2006 .

[14]  Evans.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 9 - TRANSIT SCHEDULING AND FREQUENCY , 2004 .

[15]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Urban Transit Scheduling: Framework, Review and Examples , 2002 .

[16]  Luca Quadrifoglio,et al.  MOBILITY ALLOWANCE SHUTTLE TRANSIT ( MAST ) SERVICES : FORMULATION AND SIMULATION COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL FIXED ROUTE BUS SERVICES , 2005 .

[17]  Randolph W. Hall,et al.  NETWORK DESIGN FOR A GRID HYBRID TRANSIT SERVICE , 2004 .

[18]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Assessment of the Transfer Penalty for Transit Trips Geographic Information System-Based Disaggregate Modeling Approach , 2004 .

[19]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  Transportation Service Network Design: Models and Algorithms , 1999 .

[20]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  A new regret insertion heuristic for solving large-scale dial-a-ride problems with time windows , 2004 .