Connecting Tenure Security with Durable Solutions to Internal Displacement: From Restitution of Property Rights to the Right to Adequate Housing

The end of displacement is a main goal of international peacebuilding strategies, with increasing financial and human resources committed to it. Nevertheless, protracted internal displacement remains unabated, necessitating a review of the responses provided thus far. Durable solutions to internal displacement require a safe, permanent and secure place to settle, which puts security of tenure at the centre of any sustainable option. This article emphasizes the limited understanding of the factors that contribute to secure tenure as one of the main flaws in a predominantly legal approach to the right to restitution and the right to adequate housing in responses to internal displacement. It calls for the design of contextualized and inclusive strategies to align the de jure, de facto and perception dimensions of tenure security to support the sustainable settlement of internally displaced persons as well as the construction of peace.

[1]  M. V. Leeuwen.  Renegotiating Customary Tenure Reform - Land Governance Reform and Tenure Security in Uganda , 2014 .

[2]  R. Rolnik.  Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing as a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living, and on the Right to Non-Discrimination in This Context, Raquel Rolnik , 2013 .

[3]  Catherine Boone,et al.  INTRODUCTION: LAND POLITICS IN AFRICA – CONSTITUTING AUTHORITY OVER TERRITORY, PROPERTY AND PERSONS , 2013, Africa.

[4]  I. Mosel,et al.  Sanctuary in the city? Urban displacement and vulnerability in Peshawar, Pakistan , 2013 .

[5]  J. Crisp,et al.  Displacement in urban areas: new challenges, new partnerships. , 2012, Disasters.

[6]  Eleanor Davey,et al.  Urban vulnerability and displacement: a review of current issues. , 2012, Disasters.

[7]  Cees van Westen,et al.  Coping strategies and risk manageability: using participatory geographical information systems to represent local knowledge. , 2012, Disasters.

[8]  C. Lund.  Property and Citizenship: Conceptually Connecting Land Rights and Belonging in Africa , 2011 .

[9]  M. Buchanan-Smith,et al.  City limits: urbanisation and vulnerability in Sudan Synthesis report , 2011 .

[10]  C. Brun.  Hospitality: Becoming ‘IDPs’ and ‘Hosts’ in Protracted Displacement , 2010 .

[11]  J. Gelder.  What tenure security? The case for a tripartite view , 2010 .

[12]  M. J. Ballard.  Post-Conflict Property Restitution: Flawed Legal and Theoretical Foundations , 2010 .

[13]  L. Wily.  3. Tackling land tenure in the emergency to development transition in post-conflict states: From restitution to reform , 2009 .

[14]  P. Fagen.  Peace Processes and IDP Solutions , 2009 .

[15]  E. Nkurunziza.  Informal mechanisms for accessing and securing urban land rights: the case of Kampala, Uganda , 2007 .

[16]  Daniela Heimerl.  The return of refugees and internally displaced persons: From coercion to sustainability? , 2005 .

[17]  D. Fitzpatrick.  ‘Best Practice’ Options for the Legal Recognition of Customary Tenure , 2005 .

[18]  B. Chimni.  From Resettlement to Involuntary Repatriation: Towards a Critical History of Durable Solutions to Refugee Problems , 2004 .

[19]  P. Peters.  Inequality and Social Conflict Over Land in Africa , 2004 .

[20]  C. Brun.  Local Citizens or Internally Displaced Persons? Dilemmas of Long Term Displacement in Sri Lanka , 2003 .

[21]  A. Bayat.  From `Dangerous Classes' to `Quiet Rebels' , 2000 .

[22]  W. Kombe,et al.  Reconciling informal and formal land management:: an agenda for improving tenure security and urban governance in poor countries , 2000 .