The exploitation of distributional information in syllable processing

There is now growing evidence that people are sensitive to the statistical regularities embedded into linguistic utterances, but the exact nature of the distributional information to which human performance is sensitive is an issue that has been surprisingly neglected as yet. In order to address this issue, we first propose an overview of some basic measures of association, going from the simple co-occurrence frequency to the normative measure of contingency, rw: We then report an experiment collecting judgments of word-likeness as a function of the relationship between the phonemes composing the rimes (VC). The contingency between Vs and Cs, as assessed by rw; was the best predictor of children and adult judgments. Surprisingly, the forward transitional probability ðPðC=VÞ; which is the main measure considered by language researchers, was a poor predictor of performance, whereas the backward transitional probability ðPðV=CÞ) made a sizeable contribution. We then analyze the ability of computational models to account for these results, successively considering a connectionist model based on the automatic computation of statistical regularities (SRN) [Cogn. Sci. 14 (1990) 179] and a model in which the sensitivity to statistical regularities emerges as a by-product of the attentional processing of the incoming information (Parser) [J. Memory Language 39 (1998) 246]. Somewhat ironically, Parser, which implements no specific mechanisms for statistical computations, proves to be a better predictor of performance than the SRN. The generality of these results, and their implications for the issue of automaticity, are discussed. q 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Finite State Automata and Simple Recurrent Networks , 1989, Neural Computation.

[2]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[5]  R Treiman,et al.  Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  Ronald Peereman,et al.  Orthographic and Phonological Neighborhoods in Naming: Not All Neighbors Are Equally Influential in Orthographic Space , 1997 .

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning Artificial Grammars With Competitive Chunking , 1990 .

[8]  Carsten Elbro,et al.  Precursors of functional literacy , 2002 .

[9]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns , 2000 .

[10]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[11]  A. Vinter,et al.  PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation , 1998 .

[12]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Two ways of learning associations , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Case for Rules in Reasoning , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[16]  Annie Vinter,et al.  The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Distributional properties of language and sub-syllabic processing units , 2004 .

[18]  Nick Chater,et al.  Connectionist and Statistical Approaches to Language Acquisition: A Distributional Perspective. , 1998 .

[19]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Implicit Learning , 1993 .

[20]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.

[21]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations , 1997 .

[23]  U. Goswami Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study , 1986 .

[24]  R. Treiman,et al.  The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words. , 1997 .

[25]  A. Vinter,et al.  The self-organizing consciousness. , 2002, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[26]  R Treiman To what extent do orthographic units in print mirror phonological units in speech? , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  R. Peereman,et al.  Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .

[29]  R W Rieber,et al.  The language of the psychopath. , 1994, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[30]  D. Jared Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming , 2002 .

[31]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[32]  R. Treiman,et al.  Syllable Structure and the Distribution of Phonemes in English Syllables , 1997 .

[33]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Rhyme and Alliteration, Phoneme Detection, and Learning to Read. , 1990 .

[34]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[35]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Psychology of Associative Learning , 1995 .

[36]  Sébastien Pacton,et al.  The acquisition of untaught orthographic regularities in French , 2002 .