Topographic cell instructive patterns to control cell adhesion, polarization and migration

Topographic patterns are known to affect cellular processes such as adhesion, migration and differentiation. However, the optimal way to deliver topographic signals to provide cells with precise instructions has not been defined yet. In this work, we hypothesize that topographic patterns may be able to control the sensing and adhesion machinery of cells when their interval features are tuned on the characteristic lengths of filopodial probing and focal adhesions (FAs). Features separated by distance beyond the length of filopodia cannot be readily perceived; therefore, the formation of new adhesions is discouraged. If, however, topographic features are separated by a distance within the reach of filopodia extension, cells can establish contact between adjacent topographic islands. In the latter case, cell adhesion and polarization rely upon the growth of FAs occurring on a specific length scale that depends on the chemical properties of the surface. Topographic patterns and chemical properties may interfere with the growth of FAs, thus making adhesions unstable. To test this hypothesis, we fabricated different micropatterned surfaces displaying feature dimensions and adhesive properties able to interfere with the filopodial sensing and the adhesion maturation, selectively. Our data demonstrate that it is possible to exert a potent control on cell adhesion, elongation and migration by tuning topographic features’ dimensions and surface chemistry.

[1]  P. Hansma,et al.  Force spectroscopy of collagen fibers to investigate their mechanical properties and structural organization. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[2]  A F von Recum,et al.  Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  D. Stamatialis,et al.  Insights into the role of material surface topography and wettability on cell-material interactions , 2010 .

[4]  J. Spatz,et al.  Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[5]  M. Biggs,et al.  Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330 nm deep microgrooves , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  K. Manzoor,et al.  Osteointegration of titanium implant is sensitive to specific nanostructure morphology. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  G. Schevzov,et al.  A Molecular Pathway for Myosin II Recruitment to Stress Fibers , 2011, Current Biology.

[8]  J. Jansen,et al.  The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[9]  David Moratal,et al.  Role of Surface Chemistry in Protein Remodeling at the Cell-Material Interface , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  L. Bačáková,et al.  Effect of different surface nanoroughness of titanium dioxide films on the growth of human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  Yong Yang,et al.  Nanoscale surfacing for regenerative medicine. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[12]  Deok-Ho Kim,et al.  Patterning Methods for Polymers in Cell and Tissue Engineering , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Benjamin G Keselowsky,et al.  Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[15]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[17]  Takashi Ushida,et al.  The switching of focal adhesion maturation sites and actin filament activation for MSCs by topography of well-defined micropatterned surfaces. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[18]  A. Mogilner,et al.  The physics of filopodial protrusion. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Theodore J Perkins,et al.  Robust patterns in the stochastic organization of filopodia , 2010, BMC Cell Biology.

[20]  Paolo A Netti,et al.  Tuning the material-cytoskeleton crosstalk via nanoconfinement of focal adhesions. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[21]  Paul Nealey,et al.  Characterization of endothelial basement membrane nanotopography in rhesus macaque as a guide for vessel tissue engineering. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[22]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  T. V. van Kooten,et al.  The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants. , 1995, Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition.

[24]  A. Takahara,et al.  Wetting transition from the Cassie-Baxter state to the Wenzel state on textured polymer surfaces. , 2014, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  V. Vogel,et al.  The role of filopodia in the recognition of nanotopographies , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[26]  M. Ichiba,et al.  Abl-1-bridged tyrosine phosphorylation of VASP by Abelson kinase impairs association of VASP to focal adhesions and regulates leukaemic cell adhesion. , 2012, The Biochemical journal.

[27]  A S G Curtis,et al.  An in vivo microfabricated scaffold for tendon repair. , 2005, European cells & materials.

[28]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. , 2010, European cells & materials.

[29]  A. F. Recum,et al.  The influence of micro-topography on cellular response and the implications for silicone implants , 1996 .

[30]  C. Murphy,et al.  Determining the mechanical properties of human corneal basement membranes with atomic force microscopy. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[31]  N. Kirchgessner,et al.  The filopodium , 2011, Cell adhesion & migration.

[32]  C. Murphy,et al.  Nanoscale topography-induced modulation of fundamental cell behaviors of rabbit corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  Paolo A Netti,et al.  Determinants of cell–material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[34]  P. Mattila,et al.  Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.