Bipedal locomotion modeled as the central pattern generator (CPG) and regulated by self organizing map for model of cortex

This paper describes a biologically inspired algorithm mimicking locomotion, and associated brain inspired software architecture to model bipedal gait. The central pattern generator (CPG) neural network is first modeled and next, self-organizing maps of gait for running and walking are created. This biological or brain inspired neural network model is finally assimilated to account for cortical control or modulation of gait. This work demonstrates the utility of using the CPG neural networks and self-organizing maps as the controller to mimic normal and abnormal gait patterns. The work presented here is our first step towards developing a biologically inspired neuroprosthetic device to help stroke patients regain normal gait at a faster pace.

[1]  Y. C. Lee,et al.  Turing equivalence of neural networks with second order connection weights , 1991, IJCNN-91-Seattle International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[2]  V. Dietz.  Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Susan D Horn,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Richard Robitaille,et al.  Glial cells in synaptic plasticity , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[5]  R. J. Vogelstein,et al.  Phase-Dependent Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Locomotor Activity , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  G. Yavuzer,et al.  Mirror therapy enhances lower-extremity motor recovery and motor functioning after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  B. Mulloney,et al.  Coordination of Cellular Pattern-Generating Circuits that Control Limb Movements: The Sources of Stable Differences in Intersegmental Phases , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Stroke: neuroplasticity and recent approaches to rehabilitation , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[9]  Sten Grillner,et al.  Innate versus learned movements--a false dichotomy? , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[10]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[11]  J. Cauraugh,et al.  Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  E. Marder,et al.  Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements , 2001, Current Biology.

[13]  Keir G. Pearson,et al.  Descending command systems for the initiation of locomotion in mammals , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[14]  A. Jean.  Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[15]  Scott L. Hooper.  Central Pattern Generators , 2001 .

[16]  W. Yang,et al.  Optimizing Neural Oscillators for Rhythmic Movement Control , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[17]  Julia T. Choi,et al.  Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Hava T. Siegelmann,et al.  The Computational Power of Interactive Recurrent Neural Networks , 2012, Neural Computation.

[19]  K. Zahs,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Activity by Glial Cells in the Retina , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.